Literature DB >> 9925078

The importance of physical fitness in the performance of adequate cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

A Lucía1, J F de las Heras, M Pérez, J C Elvira, A Carvajal, A J Alvarez, J L Chicharro.   

Abstract

The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the influence of the physical fitness of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) provider on the performance of and physiologic response to CPR. To this end, comparisons were made of sedentary and physically active subjects in terms of CPR performance and physiologic variables. Two study groups were established: group P (n=14), composed of sedentary, professional CPR rescuers (mean [+/-SD]; age, 34+/-6 years; VO2max, 32.5+/-5.5 mL/kg/min), and group Ex (n=14), composed of physically active, nonexperienced subjects (age, 34+/-6 years; VO2max, 44.5+/-8.5 mL/kg/min). Each subject was required to perform an 18-min CPR session, which involved manual external cardiac compressions (ECCs) on an electronic teaching mannequin following accepted standard CPR guidelines. Subjects' gas exchange parameters and heart rates (HRs) were monitored throughout the trial. Variables indicating the adequacy of the ECCs (ECC depth and the percentage of incorrect compressions and hand placements) also were determined. Overall CPR performance was similar in both groups. The indicators of ECC adequacy fell within accepted limits (ie, an ECC depth between 38 and 51 mm). However, fatigue prevented four subjects from group P from completing the trial. In contrast, the physiologic responses to CPR differed between groups. The indicators of the intensity of effort during the trial, such as HR or percentage of maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) were higher in group P subjects than group Ex subjects, respectively (HRs at the end of the trial, 139+/-22 vs 115+/-17 beats/min, p < 0.01; percentage of VO2max after 12 min of CPR, 46.7+/-9.7% vs 37.2+/-10.4%, p < 0.05). These results suggest that a certain level of physical fitness may be beneficial to CPR providers to ensure the adequacy of chest compressions performed during relatively long periods of cardiac arrest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9925078     DOI: 10.1378/chest.115.1.158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  10 in total

1.  Part 12: Education, implementation, and teams: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Mary E Mancini; Farhan Bhanji; John E Billi; Jennifer Dennett; Judith Finn; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma; Gavin D Perkins; David L Rodgers; Mary Fran Hazinski; Ian Jacobs; Peter T Morley
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  Influence of Physical Activity of the Rescuer on Chest Compression Duration and its Effects on Hemodynamics and Fatigue Levels of the Rescuer: A Simulation-based Study.

Authors:  Varun R Nayak; Akhila Babu; Ramesh Unnikrishnan; Abraham Samuel Babu; Handattu Mahabaleswara Krishna
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-06

3.  Differences in Hands-off Time According to the Position of a Second Rescuer When Switching Compression in Pre-hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Provided by Two Bystanders: A Randomized, Controlled, Parallel Study.

Authors:  Yong Hwan Kim; Jun Ho Lee; Dong Woo Lee; Kwang Won Cho; Mun Ju Kang; Yang Weon Kim; Kyoung Yul Lee; Young Hwan Lee; Jin Joo Kim; Seong Youn Hwang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Incarcerated groin hernias in adults: presentation and outcome.

Authors:  J A Alvarez; R F Baldonedo; I G Bear; J A S Solís; P Alvarez; J I Jorge
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Impact of physical fitness and biometric data on the quality of external chest compression: a randomised, crossover trial.

Authors:  Sebastian G Russo; Peter Neumann; Sylvia Reinhardt; Arnd Timmermann; André Niklas; Michael Quintel; Christoph B Eich
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2011-11-04

6.  Degree of exercise intensity during continuous chest compression in upper-body-trained individuals.

Authors:  Hisayoshi Ogata; Ikuyo Fujimaru; Takaharu Kondo
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 2.867

7.  A randomized cross-over study of the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation among females performing 30:2 and hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Cynthia Trowbridge; Jesal N Parekh; Mark D Ricard; Jerald Potts; W Clive Patrickson; Carolyn L Cason
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2009-07-07

8.  Adult Basic Life Support: International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Theresa M Olasveengen; Mary E Mancini; Gavin D Perkins; Suzanne Avis; Steven Brooks; Maaret Castrén; Sung Phil Chung; Julie Considine; Keith Couper; Raffo Escalante; Tetsuo Hatanaka; Kevin K C Hung; Peter Kudenchuk; Swee Han Lim; Chika Nishiyama; Giuseppe Ristagno; Federico Semeraro; Christopher M Smith; Michael A Smyth; Christian Vaillancourt; Jerry P Nolan; Mary Fran Hazinski; Peter T Morley
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.262

9.  Chest compression quality, exercise intensity, and energy expenditure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using compression-to-ventilation ratios of 15:1 or 30:2 or chest compression only: a randomized, crossover manikin study.

Authors:  Se-Jung Kwak; Young-Min Kim; Hee Jin Baek; Se Hong Kim; Hyeon Woo Yim
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2016-09-30

10.  The optimal number of personnel for good quality of chest compressions: A prospective randomized parallel manikin trial.

Authors:  Syunsuke Yamanaka; Ji Young Huh; Kei Nishiyama; Hiroyuki Hayashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.