Literature DB >> 26339178

Differences in Hands-off Time According to the Position of a Second Rescuer When Switching Compression in Pre-hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Provided by Two Bystanders: A Randomized, Controlled, Parallel Study.

Yong Hwan Kim1, Jun Ho Lee1, Dong Woo Lee1, Kwang Won Cho1, Mun Ju Kang1, Yang Weon Kim2, Kyoung Yul Lee3, Young Hwan Lee4, Jin Joo Kim5, Seong Youn Hwang1.   

Abstract

The change of compressing personnel will inevitably accompany hands off time when cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is performed by two or more rescuers. The present study assessed whether changing compression by a second rescuer located on the opposite side (OS) of the first rescuer can reduce hands-off time compared to CPR on the same side (SS) when CPR is performed by two rescuers. The scenario of this randomized, controlled, parallel simulation study was compression-only CPR by two laypersons in a pre-hospital situation. Considering sex ratio, 64 participants were matched up in 32 teams equally divided into two gender groups, i.e. , homogenous or heterogeneous. Each team was finally allocated to one of two study groups according to the position of changing compression (SS or OS). Every team performed chest compression for 8 min and 10 sec, with chest compression changed every 2 min. The primary endpoint was cumulative hands-off time. Cumulative hands-off time of the SS group was about 2 sec longer than the OS group, and was significant (6.6 ± 2.6 sec vs. 4.5 ± 1.5 sec, P = 0.005). The range of hands off time of the SS group was wider than for the OS group. The mean hands-off times of each rescuer turn significantly shortened with increasing number of turns (P = 0.005). A subgroup analysis in which cumulative hands-off time was divided into three subgroups in 5-sec intervals revealed that about 70% of the SS group was included in subgroups with delayed hands-off time ≥ 5 sec, with only 25% of the OS group included in these subgroups (P = 0.033). Changing compression at the OS of each rescuer reduced hands-off time compared to the SS in prehospital hands-only CPR provided by two bystanders.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; Manikins

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26339178      PMCID: PMC4553685          DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.9.1347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Med Sci        ISSN: 1011-8934            Impact factor:   2.153


  30 in total

1.  Effect of rescuer fatigue on performance of continuous external chest compressions over 3 min.

Authors:  A Ashton; A McCluskey; C L Gwinnutt; A M Keenan
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  Adverse outcomes of interrupted precordial compression during automated defibrillation.

Authors:  Ting Yu; Max Harry Weil; Wanchun Tang; Shijie Sun; Kada Klouche; Heitor Povoas; Joe Bisera
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Rediscovering the importance of chest compressions to improve the outcome from cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Lars Wik
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 4.  Part 5: adult basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Authors:  Robert A Berg; Robin Hemphill; Benjamin S Abella; Tom P Aufderheide; Diana M Cave; Mary Fran Hazinski; E Brooke Lerner; Thomas D Rea; Michael R Sayre; Robert A Swor
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Rescuer fatigue: standard versus continuous chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Joseph W Heidenreich; Robert A Berg; Travis A Higdon; Gordon A Ewy; Karl B Kern; Arthur B Sanders
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Effects of compression depth and pre-shock pauses predict defibrillation failure during cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Dana P Edelson; Benjamin S Abella; Jo Kramer-Johansen; Lars Wik; Helge Myklebust; Anne M Barry; Raina M Merchant; Terry L Vanden Hoek; Petter A Steen; Lance B Becker
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  Adverse hemodynamic effects of interrupting chest compressions for rescue breathing during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest.

Authors:  R A Berg; A B Sanders; K B Kern; R W Hilwig; J W Heidenreich; M E Porter; G A Ewy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-11-13       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Effect of timing and duration of a single chest compression pause on short-term survival following prolonged ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Gregory P Walcott; Sharon B Melnick; Robert G Walker; Isabelle Banville; Fred W Chapman; Cheryl R Killingsworth; Raymond E Ideker
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 5.262

9.  Minimally interrupted cardiac resuscitation by emergency medical services for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Bentley J Bobrow; Lani L Clark; Gordon A Ewy; Vatsal Chikani; Arthur B Sanders; Robert A Berg; Peter B Richman; Karl B Kern
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Interactive video instruction improves the quality of dispatcher-assisted chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation in simulated cardiac arrests.

Authors:  Chih-Wei Yang; Hui-Chih Wang; Wen-Chu Chiang; Che-Wei Hsu; Wei-Tien Chang; Zui-Shen Yen; Patrick Chow-In Ko; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma; Shyr-Chyr Chen; Shan-Chwen Chang
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  1 in total

1.  Interventions to improve the quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kuan-Yu Chen; Ying-Chih Ko; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Wen-Chu Chiang; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.