Literature DB >> 9925014

Acquired resistance to acoustic trauma by sound conditioning is primarily mediated by changes restricted to the cochlea, not by systemic responses.

T Yamasoba1, D F Dolan, J M Miller.   

Abstract

Hearing loss caused by intense sound exposure can be significantly reduced by pre-exposing subjects to moderate-level acoustic stimuli. This phenomenon occurs in a variety of mammals. We investigated whether sound conditioning provides acquired resistance to acoustic trauma through local mechanisms selectively in the conditioned ears or if systemic mechanisms are involved that would yield contralateral protection in unconditioned ears. Guinea pigs (group I) in which one external ear canal was occluded were exposed to conditioning sound (2-20 kHz, 85 dB SPL, 5 h/day, 10 days). After removing the occlusion, the animals were then subjected bilaterally to intense noise (2-20 kHz, 110 dB SPL, 5 h) 5 days after the last conditioning exposure. Animals without ear canal occlusion were also exposed to the intense sound without conditioning (group II) or following the same conditioning exposure (group III). Intense sound exposure caused significantly greater permanent ABR threshold shifts at all frequencies tested (4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 kHz) in group II than in group III. In group I, the occluded ears showed significantly greater threshold shifts at all frequencies compared to the unoccluded ears. The threshold shifts in the occluded ears in group I were identical to those observed in group II; and the shifts in unoccluded ears in group I were identical to those in group III. Protective effects provided by sound conditioning were almost the same in group III and in the unoccluded ears in group I. The extent of hair cell damage supported the physiological findings. These results indicate that acquired resistance to acoustic trauma provided by sound conditioning is restricted to the cochlea exposed to conditioning sound, suggesting that conditioning protection is mediated primarily by the changes that occur locally within the conditioned cochlea. This animal model, with unilateral external ear canal occlusion during sound conditioning, is useful for studies of the mechanisms of conditioning protection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9925014     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(98)00178-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  9 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances: otolaryngology.

Authors:  A Richards; M Gleeson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-23

2.  Heat stress and protection from permanent acoustic injury in mice.

Authors:  N Yoshida; A Kristiansen; M C Liberman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The mouse cochlea expresses a local hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal equivalent signaling system and requires corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1 to establish normal hair cell innervation and cochlear sensitivity.

Authors:  Christine E Graham; Douglas E Vetter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Current aspects of hearing loss from occupational and leisure noise.

Authors:  S Plontke; H-P Zenner
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-12-28

Review 5.  The cochlear CRF signaling systems and their mechanisms of action in modulating cochlear sensitivity and protection against trauma.

Authors:  Christine E Graham; Johnvesly Basappa; Sevin Turcan; Douglas E Vetter
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2011-09-11       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 6.  The cochlea as an independent neuroendocrine organ: expression and possible roles of a local hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis-equivalent signaling system.

Authors:  Johnvesly Basappa; Christine E Graham; Sevin Turcan; Douglas E Vetter
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Urocortin 3 signalling in the auditory brainstem aids recovery of hearing after reversible noise-induced threshold shift.

Authors:  Matthew J Fischl; Margarete A Ueberfuhr; Markus Drexl; Sara Pagella; James L Sinclair; Olga Alexandrova; Jan M Deussing; Conny Kopp-Scheinpflug
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 8.  Use of the guinea pig in studies on the development and prevention of acquired sensorineural hearing loss, with an emphasis on noise.

Authors:  Gaëlle Naert; Marie-Pierre Pasdelou; Colleen G Le Prell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.482

9.  Noise-Induced "Toughening" Effect in Wistar Rats: Enhanced Auditory Brainstem Responses Are Related to Calretinin and Nitric Oxide Synthase Upregulation.

Authors:  Juan C Alvarado; Verónica Fuentes-Santamaría; María C Gabaldón-Ull; Tania Jareño-Flores; Josef M Miller; José M Juiz
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.856

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.