Literature DB >> 992363

Genetic variation in a heterogeneous environment. II. Temporal heterogeneity and directional selection.

P W Hedrick.   

Abstract

The maintenance of genetic variation is investigated in a finite population where selection at an autosomal locus with two alleles varies temporally between two environments and the heterozygote has an intermediate fitness value. When there is additive gene action and equal selection in both environments, the autocorrelation between subsequent environments must be negative for more maintenance of genetic variation than for neutrality. The maximum maintenance occurs when there is equal selection in the two environments and the autocorrelation approaches -1.0 (for a stochastic model), or when there is short repeating cycle such as one related to seasons. Also comparison of the effects of stochastic variation in selection in finite ans infinite populations is made by using Monte Carlo simulation. One situation was found where temporal environmental variation maintains genetic variation very effectively even in a small population and that is when there is evolution of dominance, i.e., the heterozygote is closer in fitness to the favored homozygote than the other homozygote. An important conclusion is that in a finite population genetic tracing of environmental change, particularly when there is a positive autocorrelation between environments or a long environmental cycle, leads to an increased loss of genetic variation making such a response undesirable in the long term, a result different from that in infinite populations.

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 992363      PMCID: PMC1213561     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  4 in total

1.  Maintenance of genetic heterogeneity.

Authors:  E R DEMPSTER
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1955

2.  Insect Survival and Selection for Pattern: Most camouflage and survival mechanisms, though highly perfected, can be adapted to changing environments.

Authors:  H B Kettlewell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-06-04       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Random selective advantages of genes and their probabilities of fixation.

Authors:  L Jensen
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Habitat selection in a variable environment.

Authors:  E H Bryant
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 2.691

  4 in total
  13 in total

1.  Why are not all chilies hot? A trade-off limits pungency.

Authors:  David C Haak; Leslie A McGinnis; Douglas J Levey; Joshua J Tewksbury
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Phenotypic Plasticity Promotes Balanced Polymorphism in Periodic Environments by a Genomic Storage Effect.

Authors:  Davorka Gulisija; Yuseob Kim; Joshua B Plotkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Quantitative genetic analysis of the body size and shape of Drosophila buzzatii.

Authors:  R H Thomas; J S Barker
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Seasonally fluctuating selection can maintain polymorphism at many loci via segregation lift.

Authors:  Meike J Wittmann; Alan O Bergland; Marcus W Feldman; Paul S Schmidt; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Chromosomal Polymorphism and Female Receptivity in a Natural Population of DROSOPHILA PERSIMILIS.

Authors:  H F Yu; E B Spiess
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  A general population genetic framework for antagonistic selection that accounts for demography and recurrent mutation.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  From tides to nucleotides: Genomic signatures of adaptation to environmental heterogeneity in barnacles.

Authors:  Joaquin C B Nunez; Stephen Rong; David A Ferranti; Alejandro Damian-Serrano; Kimberly B Neil; Henrik Glenner; Rebecca G Elyanow; Bianca R P Brown; Magnus Alm Rosenblad; Anders Blomberg; Kerstin Johannesson; David M Rand
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 6.622

8.  The roles of standing genetic variation and evolutionary history in determining the evolvability of anti-predator strategies.

Authors:  Daniel R O'Donnell; Abhijna Parigi; Jordan A Fish; Ian Dworkin; Aaron P Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genomic evidence of rapid and stable adaptive oscillations over seasonal time scales in Drosophila.

Authors:  Alan O Bergland; Emily L Behrman; Katherine R O'Brien; Paul S Schmidt; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Environmental noise, genetic diversity and the evolution of evolvability and robustness in model gene networks.

Authors:  Christopher F Steiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.