Literature DB >> 9923428

Proprioceptive function in knees with and without total knee arthroplasty.

S Fuchs1, L Thorwesten, S Niewerth.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate the differences in angle reproduction capability after nonconstrained posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty after a follow-up time of 63.9 months compared with the healthy contralateral leg and a control group. In 28 total knee arthroplasty patients (mean age, 65.7 yr) and 25 control subjects (mean age, 55.7 yr), 16 measurements were made between 0 degrees and 90 degrees in 30 degree steps. The leg was positioned by the examiner and then relaxed; afterward, the subject was asked to reproduce the original position. Each measurement was made with the patient or control being blindfolded and not blindfolded to assess the influence of visual control. We found significant differences in total knee arthroplasty patients in contrast to healthy subjects. Without visual control, the mean deviation of the total knee arthroplasty group starting with a 0 degree angle was 7.7+/-5.9 degrees and 4.6+/-4.7 degrees for the healthy subjects. With visual control, the mean deviation in the patient group was 11+/-7.5 degrees, and in the control group, it was 7.2+/-5.0 degrees. Total knee arthroplasty patients did not show significant differences between the operated on and the contralateral knee. Also, in the total knee arthroplasty group, significant differences could not be found comparing reproduction with and without visual control and comparing both starting positions. In the control group, significant differences could be found comparing visual and nonvisual control in the 60 degree angle. The comparison between the 30 and 60 degree repositioning from both 0 and 90 degree starting positions showed a significant difference in the 60 degree angle. In summary, reduced proprioceptive capabilities are present after knee arthroplasty in both the operated on and the contralateral leg in our study group. Postoperative complaints can perhaps be explained by a loss of proprioceptive capabilities, especially at the 60 degree angle. The operative technique should involve special care of ligaments and muscles to preserve stability and receptors as well. Rehabilitation should pay more attention to the remaining receptors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9923428     DOI: 10.1097/00002060-199901000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  13 in total

1.  Lower limb proprioception deficits persist following knee replacement surgery despite improvements in knee extension strength.

Authors:  Pazit Levinger; Hylton B Menz; Adam D Morrow; Elin Wee; Julian A Feller; John R Bartlett; Neil Bergman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparing single and multi-joint methods to detect knee joint proprioception deficits post primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Abderrahman Ouattas; Elizabeth Wellsandt; Nathaniel H Hunt; C Kent Boese; Brian A Knarr
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Clinical and functional comparison of uni- and bicondylar sledge prostheses.

Authors:  S Fuchs; C O Tibesku; D Frisse; M Genkinger; H Laass; D Rosenbaum
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Does cruciate retention primary total knee arthroplasty affect proprioception, strength and clinical outcome?

Authors:  Pieter-Jan T K Vandekerckhove; Roel Parys; Thomas Tampere; Patrick Linden; Luc Van den Daelen; Peter C Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty of the patellofemoral and medial compartments.

Authors:  Emmanuel Thienpont; Andrew Price
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-11-25       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Physiological risk factors for falls in people with knee osteoarthritis before and early after knee replacement surgery.

Authors:  Pazit Levinger; Hylton B Menz; Elin Wee; Julian A Feller; John R Bartlett; Neil R Bergman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Enhancement of parkinsonian rigidity with contralateral hand activation.

Authors:  Douglas Powell; Nicholas Hanson; A Joseph Threlkeld; Xiang Fang; Ruiping Xia
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Section of the anterior cruciate ligament in the rabbit as animal model for osteoarthritis progression.

Authors:  Feng Li; Zhanhai Yin; Hao Wu; Zili Qin; Zhiqiang Li; Yusheng Qiu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Outcomes before and after total knee arthroplasty compared to healthy adults.

Authors:  Michael J Bade; Wendy M Kohrt; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.751

10.  Postural Stability after Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty and Patient-Specific Interpositional Knee Spacer.

Authors:  J Goetz; M Baeurle; S Dullien; J Grifka; F Koeck; C Baier
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.