Literature DB >> 9922420

Acting without asking: an ethical analysis of the Food and Drug Administration waiver of informed consent for emergency research.

J G Adams1, J Wegener.   

Abstract

This article summarizes the current requirements for a waiver of informed consent for emergency research and analyzes ethical issues that are involved. Researchers who intend to apply for a waiver of informed consent for emergency research must understand that they are asking for the major protector of human subjects, the informed consent process, to be removed. In its absence, other protections are required. These include communication with the community, family members, and others close to the patient. It is unlikely that even these additional protections can equal that afforded by an adequate consent process. With this understanding, investigators' actions must be in accordance with the highest ethical standards. It is therefore necessary for investigators to know the ethical implications of conducting controlled research without the subjects' consent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; DHHS Guidelines; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9922420     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70398-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  15 in total

1.  Presumed consent in emergency neonatal research.

Authors:  D J Manning
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  Research in Emergency and Critical Care Settings: Debates, Obstacles and Solutions.

Authors:  Ayman El-Menyar; Mohammad Asim; Rifat Latifi; Hassan Al-Thani
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Enrollment of racially/ethnically diverse participants in traumatic brain injury trials: effect of availability of exception from informed consent.

Authors:  Jose-Miguel Yamal; Claudia S Robertson; M Laura Rubin; Julia S Benoit; H Julia Hannay; Barbara C Tilley
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  What determines whether patients are willing to participate in resuscitation studies requiring exception from informed consent?

Authors:  P-A Abboud; K Heard; A A Al-Marshad; S R Lowenstein
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Novel consent process for research in dying patients unable to give consent.

Authors:  Elizabeth Rees; Janet Hardy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-26

6.  Why persons choose to opt out of an exception from informed consent cardiac arrest trial.

Authors:  Maria J Nelson; Nicole M Deiorio; Terri A Schmidt; Dana M Zive; Denise Griffiths; Craig D Newgard
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  Regulatory challenges for the resuscitation outcomes consortium.

Authors:  Samuel A Tisherman; Judy L Powell; Terri A Schmidt; Tom P Aufderheide; Peter J Kudenchuk; Julie Spence; Dixie Climer; Donna Kelly; Angela Marcantonio; Todd Brown; George Sopko; Richard Kerber; Jeremy Sugarman; David Hoyt
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Perceived challenges to obtaining informed consent for a time-sensitive emergency department study of pediatric status epilepticus: results of two focus groups.

Authors:  James M Chamberlain; Kathleen Lillis; Cheryl Vance; Kathleen M Brown; Olubunmi Fawumi; Shari Nichols; Colleen O Davis; Tasmeen Singh; Jill M Baren
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  Patients' perceptions of research in emergency settings: a study of survivors of sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  Neal W Dickert; Nancy E Kass
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Informed consent: the rate-limiting step in acute stroke trials.

Authors:  David Z Rose; Scott E Kasner
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.