Literature DB >> 9922103

The bottleneck: mitochondrial imperatives in oogenesis and ovarian follicular fate.

R P Jansen1, K de Boer.   

Abstract

Molecular geneticists and ovarian physiologists today face the challenge of defining and reconciling two major biological imperatives that each center on oogenesis, folliculogenesis and competition between ovarian follicles: (1), defining how the mitochondrial genome--important in both aging and a number of serious mitochondrial diseases--is refreshed and purified as it passes, via the oocyte's cytoplasm, from one generation to the next; and (2), endeavouring to discover what cytoplasmic factor(s) it is that permits some eggs but not others to produce viable embryos and ongoing pregnancies. We review here in detail the passage of mitochondria through the female germ cell line. For mitochondria, the processes of oogenesis, follicle formation and loss constitute a restriction/amplification/constraint event of the kind predicted by L. Chao for purification and refinement of a haploid genome. We argue that maintaining the integrity of mitochondrial inheritance is such a strong evolutionary imperative that we should expect at least some features of ovarian follicular formation, function and loss to be primarily adapted to this specific purpose. We predict, moreover, that to prevent accumulation of mild mitochondrial genomes in the population there is a need for physiological female sterility prior to total depletion of ovarian oocytes, a phenomenon for which there is empirical evidence and which we term the oöpause.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9922103     DOI: 10.1016/s0303-7207(98)00173-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol        ISSN: 0303-7207            Impact factor:   4.102


  51 in total

1.  Redundancy, antiredundancy, and the robustness of genomes.

Authors:  David C Krakauer; Joshua B Plotkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Selection for mitonuclear co-adaptation could favour the evolution of two sexes.

Authors:  Zena Hadjivasiliou; Andrew Pomiankowski; Robert M Seymour; Nick Lane
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Germline bottlenecks, biparental inheritance and selection on mitochondrial variants: a two-level selection model.

Authors:  Denis Roze; François Rousset; Yannis Michalakis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  No evidence for presence of maternal mitochondrial DNA in the sperm of Mytilus galloprovincialis males.

Authors:  Constantinos Venetis; Ioannis Theologidis; Eleftherios Zouros; George C Rodakis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Active digestion of sperm mitochondrial DNA in single living sperm revealed by optical tweezers.

Authors:  Yoshiki Nishimura; Tomoya Yoshinari; Kiyoshi Naruse; Takeshi Yamada; Kazuyoshi Sumi; Hiroshi Mitani; Tetsuya Higashiyama; Tsuneyoshi Kuroiwa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  The causes of mutation accumulation in mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  Maurine Neiman; Douglas R Taylor
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Mitochondrial DNA genetics and the heteroplasmy conundrum in evolution and disease.

Authors:  Douglas C Wallace; Dimitra Chalkia
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 8.  The relationship between pluripotency and mitochondrial DNA proliferation during early embryo development and embryonic stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  J M Facucho-Oliveira; J C St John
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 5.739

9.  Analysis of mitochondrial length heteroplasmy in monozygous and non-monozygous siblings.

Authors:  S Lutz-Bonengel; U Schmidt; T Sänger; M Heinrich; P M Schneider; S Pollak
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 10.  Does mtDNA nucleoid organization impact aging?

Authors:  Daniel F Bogenhagen
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 4.032

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.