Literature DB >> 9921721

Personality and the subjective assessment of hearing aids.

R M Cox1, G C Alexander, G Gray.   

Abstract

Relatively little is known about the influence of patients' personality features on the responses they make to self-assessment items used to measure the outcome of a hearing aid fitting. If the personality of the hearing aid wearer has a significant influence on self-report outcome data, it would be important to explore the relevant personality variables and to be cognizant of their effects when using subjective outcome data to justify decisions about clinical services or other matters. This investigation explored the relationship between several personality attributes and responses to the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB). It found that more extroverted patients tend to report more hearing aid benefit in all speech communication situations. In addition, patients with a more external locus of control tend to have more negative reactions to loud environmental sounds, both with and without amplification. Anxiety also played a small additional role in determining APHAB responses. Although personality variables were found to explain a relatively small amount of the variance in APHAB responses (usually around 10%), these outcomes should alert practitioners and researchers to the potential effects of personality variables in all self-report data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9921721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  14 in total

1.  Audiologist-driven versus patient-driven fine tuning of hearing instruments.

Authors:  Monique Boymans; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-12-04

2.  Modeling and predicting hearing aid outcome.

Authors:  Larry E Humes
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2003

Review 3.  Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Gurjit Singh
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-03

4.  Detecting components of hearing aid fitting using a self-assessment-inventory.

Authors:  Hartmut Meister; Isabel Lausberg; Juergen Kiessling; Hasso von Wedel; Martin Walger
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Is the Device-Oriented Subjective Outcome (DOSO) Independent of Personality?

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Kelsey Dumanch; Elizabeth Stangl; Christi Miller; Kelly Tremblay; Ruth Bentler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Development of the Device-Oriented Subjective Outcome (DOSO) scale.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Genevieve C Alexander; Jingjing Xu
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Using a Digital Language Processor to Quantify the Auditory Environment and the Effect of Hearing Aids for Adults with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kelsey E Klein; Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Ruth A Bentler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Personal style and hearing aid fitting.

Authors:  Robert M Traynor; Alice E Holmes
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-03

9.  [APHAB scores for individual assessment of the benefit of hearing aid fitting].

Authors:  J Löhler; B Wollenberg; R Schönweiler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  The influence of frequency-dependent hearing loss to unaided APHAB scores.

Authors:  J Löhler; B Akcicek; B Wollenberg; T Kappe; P Schlattmann; R Schönweiler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.