Literature DB >> 992170

The effect of subsidized family planning services on reproductive behavior in the United States, 1969-1974.

J R Udry, K E Bauman, N M Morris.   

Abstract

This paper evaluates the impact of federally subsidized family planning programs in the United States, from 1969 to 1974, on the reproductive behavior of ever-married women, 15-44 years old. The study began with an experimental design and the random assigment of areas to treatment and control but was completed as a multivariate analysis, treating program input as an interval-scaled independent variable. Using "before" and "after" area sample surveys and patient service data from operating programs, the demographic impact of the program was estimated. The impact detected was nonsignificant; according to our analysis, overall use of physician-administered contraception was not affected by the subsidized programs. The only program-induced change of activity related to reproduction that we recorded was increased use of subsidized services in study areas with high program input and increased use of private physician services where program input was low. These findings need to be interpreted with the caution usually exercised in evaluating imperfect field experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 992170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Demography        ISSN: 0070-3370


  6 in total

1.  The effect of family planning in Georgia on fertility in selected rural counties.

Authors:  R W Rochat; C W Tyler; A K Schoenbucher
Journal:  Int Congr Ser       Date:  1971

2.  Population growth rates in perfect contraceptive populations.

Authors:  J R Udry; K E Bauman; C L Chase
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  1973-07

3.  Unwanted fertility and the use of contraception.

Authors:  J Richard Udry; Karl E Bauman
Journal:  Health Serv Rep       Date:  1973-10

4.  Population policy for Americans: is the government being misled?

Authors:  J Blake
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-05-02       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Use of matched pairs in evaluation of a birth control program.

Authors:  L M Okada
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Family planning and the reduction of fertility and illegitimacy: a preliminary report on a rural southern program.

Authors:  J D Beasley; V W Parrish
Journal:  Soc Biol       Date:  1969-09
  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Individual and couple intentions for more children: a research note.

Authors:  S P Morgan
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1985-02

2.  Do couples make fertility plans one birth at a time?

Authors:  J R Udry
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1983-05

3.  A cross-cultural examination of the relationship between ages at menarche, marriage, and first birth.

Authors:  J R Udry; R L Cliquet
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1982-02

4.  Family planning and abortion: have they affected fertility in Tennessee?

Authors:  H K Atrash; R W Rochat; K F Schulz; D T Allen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  The use of socioeconomic data to predict teenage birth rates. An exploratory study in Massachusetts.

Authors:  S B Perlman; L V Klerman; E M Kinard
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Use of automated record linkage to measure patient fertility after family planning service.

Authors:  C A Burnettt; C W Tyler; A K Schoenbucher; J S Terry
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Reexamining the Impact of Family Planning Programs on US Fertility: Evidence from the War on Poverty and the Early Years of Title X().

Authors:  Martha J Bailey
Journal:  Am Econ J Appl Econ       Date:  2012-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.