Literature DB >> 6862057

Do couples make fertility plans one birth at a time?

J R Udry.   

Abstract

Criteria are specified for distinguishing one-decision from sequential-decision models of fertility. Sequential decisions are not demonstrated by parity-specific differences in fertility determinants. Sequential models must demonstrate the importance of unanticipated intervening events in changing fertility plans or fertility experience. They must demonstrate that the intervening events are not caused by the fertility. Two empirical tests are designed to determine which model best fits the data. One test predicts fertility plans, the other fertility events. Both tests provide some support for sequential models.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6862057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Demography        ISSN: 0070-3370


  9 in total

1.  Some observations on the economic framework for fertility analysis.

Authors:  N K Namboodiri
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  1972-07

2.  Female work experience, employment status, and birth expectations: sequential decision-making in the Philippines.

Authors:  M R Rosenzweig
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1976-08

3.  Which couples at given parities expect to have additional births? An exercise in discriminant analysis.

Authors:  N K Namboodiri
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1974-02

4.  Dimensions of marriage happiness.

Authors:  S R Orden; N M Bradburn
Journal:  AJS       Date:  1968-05

5.  Parity-specific and two-sex utility models of reproductive intentions.

Authors:  E S Fried; S L Hofferth; J R Udry
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1980-02

6.  Fertility and female employment: problems of causal direction.

Authors:  J C Cramer
Journal:  Am Sociol Rev       Date:  1980-04

7.  The determinants of marital fertility in the United States, 1968-1970: inferences from a dynamic model.

Authors:  M Hout
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1978-05

8.  The effect of subsidized family planning services on reproductive behavior in the United States, 1969-1974.

Authors:  J R Udry; K E Bauman; N M Morris
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1976-11

9.  Values and disvalues of children in successive childbearing decisions.

Authors:  R A Bulatao
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1981-02
  9 in total
  16 in total

1.  Alternative estimates of fertility control by using parity distributions: a comment on David et al.

Authors:  T W Pullum
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1990-02

2.  A test of the Easterlin fertility model using income for two generations and a comparison with the Becker model.

Authors:  J R Behrman; P Taubman
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1989-02

3.  Measuring change and continuity in parity distributions.

Authors:  T W Pullum; L M Tedrow; J R Herting
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1989-08

4.  Cohort parity analysis: statistical estimates of the extent of fertility control.

Authors:  P A David; T A Mroz; W C Sanderson; K W Wachter; D R Weir
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1988-05

5.  Comment on Barbara Devaney's "An analysis of variations in U.S. fertility and female labor force participation trends".

Authors:  D P Smith
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1986-02

6.  The time dynamics of individual fertility preferences among rural Ghanaian women.

Authors:  Ivy A Kodzi; John B Casterline; Peter Aglobitse
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2010-03

7.  Conceptualizing Childbearing Ambivalence: A Social and Dynamic Perspective.

Authors:  Christie Sennott; Sara Yeatman
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2018-05-09

8.  The evolution of fertility expectations over the life course.

Authors:  Sarah R Hayford
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2009-11

9.  Young women's dynamic family size preferences in the context of transitioning fertility.

Authors:  Sara Yeatman; Christie Sennott; Steven Culpepper
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2013-10

10.  A joint model of marital childbearing and marital disruption.

Authors:  L A Lillard; L J Waite
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1993-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.