Literature DB >> 26114089

Spinous Process splitting Laminectomy: Clinical outcome and Radiological analysis of extent of decompression.

Seungcheol Lee1, Umesh Srikantha2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Spinous process splitting laminectomy (SPSL) is a useful technique in achieving adequate decompression for lumbar canal stenosis, has the advantage of simultaneously decompressing multiple levels and minimising injury to the paraspinal muscles. Some concern has been expressed over the efficacy of this technique in decompressing lateral recesses. This study was undertaken to assess the clinical outcome of SPSL technique and radiologically assess the extent of decompression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine consecutive patients treated by SPSL for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis were methodically assessed for demographic data, clinical findings, Pre- and post-op VAS, JOA scores and spinal canal dimensions on imaging. Surgical technique for SPSL is described.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 66.9 yrs. The mean follow-up was 7.3 months. The mean pre- and post-operative VAS scores were 7.8 and 3.7, respectively. The mean pre- and post-operative JOA scores were 6.3 and 11.2, respectively. The mean JOA recovery rate was 57.3%. 77% of the patients were in the 'good' or 'excellent' McNab's grades at follow-up. Radiologic results were assessed separately at the 118 levels decompressed by the SPSL technique. The ratio increase for the spinal canal dimensions on post-operative images were as follows - Interfacet distance-116.6%; Effective AP distance-67.6%; Right lateral recess depth-165.1%; Right lateral recess angle-145.5%; Left lateral recess depth-149.3%; Left lateral recess angle-133.6%; Cross-sectional spinal canal area-163.8%. There was no worsening of pre-existing degenerative listhesis or scoliosis in any case.
CONCLUSION: SPSL achieves effective central and lateral recess decompression, at the same time minimising injury to the paraspinal muscles thus reducing post-operative pain and aiding in quicker mobilisation and recovery. It is an effective tool to treat multiple level spinal stenosis, especially in elderly patients who have pre-existing spinal deformities which can precipitate into frank instability after conventional procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laminectomy; Lumbar stenosis; Multiple level decompression; Paraspinal muscle; Spinous process splitting; minimally invasive spine surgery

Year:  2015        PMID: 26114089      PMCID: PMC4480052          DOI: 10.14444/2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  26 in total

1.  Electromyography in paraspinal muscles following surgery for root compression.

Authors:  D H See; G H Kraft
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  The effect of bilateral laminotomy versus laminectomy on the motion and stiffness of the human lumbar spine: a biomechanical comparison.

Authors:  Michael J Lee; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens R Chapman; Amy M Cohen; Richard M Harrington; Randal P Ching
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Exploration and decompression of the spinal canal using split laminotomy and its modification, the "archbone" technique.

Authors:  Péter Banczerowski; János Vajda; Róbert Veres
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Lumbar spinal instability (olisthesis) after extensive posterior spinal decompression.

Authors:  C K Lee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Reduced postoperative wound pain after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Kota Watanabe; Morio Matsumoto; Takeshi Ikegami; Yuji Nishiwaki; Takashi Tsuji; Ken Ishii; Yuto Ogawa; Hironari Takaishi; Masaya Nakamura; Yoshiaki Toyama; Kazuhiro Chiba
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-12-10

6.  A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Five-year follow-up by an independent observer.

Authors:  B Jönsson; M Annertz; C Sjöberg; B Strömqvist
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Split-spinous process laminotomy and discectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Der-Yang Cho; Hung-Lin Lin; Wen-Yuan Lee; Han-Chung Lee
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-03

8.  Chimney sublaminar decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Swei-Ming Lin; Sheng-Hong Tseng; Jiao-Chiao Yang; Chi-Cheng Tu
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2006-05

9.  Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  K Hirabayashi; J Miyakawa; K Satomi; T Maruyama; K Wakano
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Spinous process osteotomies to facilitate lumbar decompressive surgery.

Authors:  B K Weiner; R D Fraser; M Peterson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  Restoration of the Spinous Process Following Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process.

Authors:  Seung Myung Wi; Hui Jong Lee; Sam Yeol Chang; Oh Hyo Kwon; Choon-Ki Lee; Bong-Soon Chang; Hyoungmin Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-02-18

2.  Impact of pedicle-lengthening osteotomy on spinal canal volume and neural foramen size in three types of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  P Li; L Qian; W D Wu; C F Wu; J Ouyang
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.853

3.  Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Decompression in Elderly Patients with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Morphological Analysis.

Authors:  Seungman Ha; Youngho Hong; Seungcheol Lee
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-04-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.