Literature DB >> 9918916

Mitosis and apoptosis in the liver of interleukin-6-deficient mice after partial hepatectomy.

T Sakamoto1, Z Liu, N Murase, T Ezure, S Yokomuro, V Poli, A J Demetris.   

Abstract

Recently, it was shown that hepatocyte DNA synthesis after partial hepatectomy (PH) is impaired in interleukin-6-deficient (IL-6(-/-)) mice, which results in significantly delayed, but eventual, recovery of normal liver weight, compared with the IL-6(+/+) controls. Four possible compensatory mechanisms might explain this phenomenon: 1) hepatocyte hypertrophy; 2) activation of the oval cell compartment and subsequent maturation to hepatocytes; 3) non-oval biliary epithelial cell (BEC) proliferation; and/or 4) differential rates of apoptotic cell death in the regenerating liver. These hypotheses were tested by subjecting IL-6(-/-) and IL-6(+/+) mice to PH and determining sequential liver weight, histology, hepatocyte and BEC 5'-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) labeling, liver DNA content, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) mRNA production, and apoptosis at several time points after PH. Consistent with previous studies, we show that the absence of IL-6 significantly impairs hepatocyte DNA synthesis and delays liver weight recovery after PH, but the defect observed in this study is less severe than that previously reported, and no excess mortality, massive necrosis on histology, nor differences in liver injury test are seen. Interestingly, the IL-6(-/-) mice show more hepatocyte BrdU pulse labeling than the IL-6(+/+) controls at 24 hours, but less at 36, 48, and 60 hours. Continuous BrdU infusion up to 60 hours after PH showed a cumulative hepatocyte labeling index of 79.5% in IL-6(+/+) mice and 70.8% in IL-6(-/-) mice, respectively (P <.03). However, despite a lower labeling index and significantly delayed weight recovery, hepatic mass was equally restored in the two groups by 96 hours. There was no evidence of oval cell proliferation in the IL-6(-/-) mice, as determined by routine histology and AFP mRNA analysis, and non-oval BEC proliferation was also slightly impaired in the IL-6(-/-) mice compared with the IL-6(+/+) mice. In addition, liver DNA content per gram of liver showed an increase compared with normal at 60 hours in both groups, but by 96 hours, there was no difference between the two groups. Thus, neither oval cell nor BEC proliferation, nor hepatocyte hypertrophy, could account for the eventual equivalent weight recovery. There was, however, a difference between the two groups in the rate of apoptosis. In normal livers of both IL-6(-/-) and IL-6(+/+) mice, apoptotic cells were uncommon, and even fewer such cells were detected at 24, 36, and 48 hours after PH. Between 60 and 96 hours after PH, a wave of apoptosis spread through the livers of both groups. The number of apoptotic cells was directly proportional to the magnitude of hepatocyte BrdU labeling and liver DNA content after PH, and the difference between the nadir of apoptosis at 24 hours and the peak at 96 hours was greater for the IL-6(+/+) mice. In addition, a direct comparison between the two groups at 96 hours showed that hepatocyte apoptosis was significantly lower in the IL-6(-/-) versus the IL-6(+/+) mice (P <. 02). Treatment of the IL-6(-/-) mice with rIL-6 completely reversed the hepatocyte proliferation defect and increased the subsequent level of total apoptotic bodies. The fine control of liver weight recovery during regeneration after PH is a complex process that involves both mitosis and apoptosis. IL-6 affects this process by recruiting, and possibly synchronizing, the entry of hepatocytes into cell cycling, which quickly restores liver mass. However, this robust response generates superfluous hepatocytes, which are eliminated via apoptosis, similar to many other processes involving organ growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9918916     DOI: 10.1002/hep.510290244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  68 in total

Review 1.  Molecular regulation of hepatocyte generation in adult animals.

Authors:  Joe W Grisham; William B Coleman
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Combined systemic elimination of MET and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling completely abolishes liver regeneration and leads to liver decompensation.

Authors:  Shirish Paranjpe; William C Bowen; Wendy M Mars; Anne Orr; Meagan M Haynes; Marie C DeFrances; Silvia Liu; George C Tseng; Anastasia Tsagianni; George K Michalopoulos
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  Disrupted NF- kappa B activation after partial hepatectomy does not impair hepatocyte proliferation in rats.

Authors:  Stéphanie Laurent; Yves Horsmans; Peter Stärkel; Isabelle Leclercq; Christine Sempoux; Luc Lambotte
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Liver regeneration.

Authors:  George K Michalopoulos
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 5.  Liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy: critical analysis of mechanistic dilemmas.

Authors:  George K Michalopoulos
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Targeted deletion of hepatocyte Ikkbeta confers growth advantages.

Authors:  Katherine S Koch; Shin Maeda; Guobin He; Michael Karin; Hyam L Leffert
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  HGF-, EGF-, and dexamethasone-induced gene expression patterns during formation of tissue in hepatic organoid cultures.

Authors:  George K Michalopoulos; William C Bowen; Karen Mulè; Jianhua Luo
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  2003

8.  Portacaval shunt causes apoptosis and liver atrophy in rats despite increases in endogenous levels of major hepatic growth factors.

Authors:  Chandrashekhar R Gandhi; Noriko Murase; Vladimir M Subbotin; Tadahiro Uemura; Michael Nalesnik; Anthony J Demetris; John J Fung; Thomas E Starzl
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 25.083

9.  Met provides essential signals for liver regeneration.

Authors:  Malgorzata Borowiak; Alistair N Garratt; Torsten Wüstefeld; Michael Strehle; Christian Trautwein; Carmen Birchmeier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Tob1 is a constitutively expressed repressor of liver regeneration.

Authors:  Karen J Ho; Nhue L Do; Hasan H Otu; Martin J Dib; Xianghui Ren; Keiichi Enjyoji; Simon C Robson; Ernest F Terwilliger; Seth J Karp
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 14.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.