Literature DB >> 9918204

A comparison of clinical pharmacodynamics of different administration schedules of oral topotecan (Hycamtin)

C J Gerrits1, J H Schellens, H Burris, J R Eckardt, A S Planting, M E van der Burg, G I Rodriguez, W J Loos, V van Beurden, I Hudson, D D Von Hoff, J Verweij.   

Abstract

Prolonged exposure to topotecan in in vitro and in vivo experiments has yielded the highest antitumor efficacy. An oral formulation of topotecan with a bioavailability of 32-44% in humans enables convenient prolonged administration. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships from four Phase I studies with different schedules of administration of oral topotecan in 99 adult patients with malignant solid tumors refractory to standard forms of chemotherapy were compared. Topotecan was administered as follows: (a) once daily (o.d.) for 5 days every 21 days (29 patients); (b) o.d. for 10 days every 21 days (19 patients); (c) twice daily (b.i.d.) for 10 days every 21 days (20 patients); and (d) b.i.d. for 21 days every 28 days (31 patients). Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in 55 patients using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assay and noncompartmental pharmacokinetic methods. Totals of 109, 48, 64, and 59 courses were given, respectively. Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of granulocytopenia for the o.d. x 5-day dosage, a combination of myelosuppression and diarrhea in both of the 10-day schedules, and only diarrhea in the 21-day schedule. Pharmacokinetics revealed a substantial variation of the area under curve (AUC) of topotecan lactone in all of the dose schedules with a mean intrapatient variation of 25.4 +/- 31.0% (o.d. x 5), 34.5 +/- 25.0% (o.d. x 10), 96.5 +/- 70.1% (b.i.d. x 10), and 59.5 +/- 51.0% (b.i.d. x 21). Significant correlations were observed between myelotoxicity parameters and AUC(t) day 1 and AUC(t) per course of topotecan lactone. In all of the studies, similar sigmoidal relationships could be established between AUC(t) per course and the percentage decrease of WBCs. At maximum-tolerated dose level, no significant difference in AUC(t) per course was found [AUC(t) per course was 107.4 +/- 33.7 ng x h/ml (o.d. x 5), 145.3 +/- 23.8 ng x h/ml (o.d. x 10), 100.0 +/- 41.5 ng x h/ml (b.i.d. x 10), and 164.9 +/- 92.2 ng x h/ml (b.i.d. x 21), respectively.] For oral topotecan, the schedule rather than the AUC(t)-per-course seemed to be related to the type of toxicity. Prolonged oral administration resulted in intestinal side effects as a dose-limiting toxicity, and short-term administration resulted in granulocytopenia. On the basis of this pharmacokinetic study, no schedule preference could be expressed, but based on patient convenience, administration once daily for 5 days could be favored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9918204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  13 in total

Review 1.  Promising approaches in acute leukemia.

Authors:  J Cortes; H M Kantarjian
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Topotecan: a review of its efficacy in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  D Ormrod; C M Spencer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Oral topoisomerase 1 inhibitors in adult patients: present and future.

Authors:  H A Gelderblom; M J DE Jonge; A Sparreboom; J Verweij
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of oral topotecan in patients with advanced solid tumours and impaired renal function.

Authors:  Lot A Devriese; Petronella Els O Witteveen; Marja Mergui-Roelvink; Deborah A Smith; Lionel D Lewis; David S Mendelson; Yung-Jue Bang; Hyun Choel Chung; Mohammed M Dar; Alwin D R Huitema; Jos H Beijnen; Emile E Voest; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Initial testing of topotecan by the pediatric preclinical testing program.

Authors:  Hernan Carol; Peter J Houghton; Christopher L Morton; E Anders Kolb; Richard Gorlick; C Patrick Reynolds; Min H Kang; John M Maris; Stephen T Keir; Amy Watkins; Malcolm A Smith; Richard B Lock
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 6.  Toxicity patterns of cytotoxic drugs.

Authors:  Etienne Chatelut; Jean-Pierre Delord; Pierre Canal
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.850

7.  Optimal modeling for phase I design of a two drug combination-results of a phase I study of cisplatin with 9-nitrocamptothecin.

Authors:  S-J Lee; M Gounder; E H Rubin; Jong Ming Li; Zheming Gu; A Thalasila; E Loyer; A P Kudelka; C F Verschraegen
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 3.850

8.  Overlapping functions of ABC transporters in topotecan disposition as determined in gene knockout mouse models.

Authors:  Amit K Tiwari; Rong Zhang; James M Gallo
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 9.  Cancer therapies utilizing the camptothecins: a review of the in vivo literature.

Authors:  Vincent J Venditto; Eric E Simanek
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Drug sensitivity patterns of HHV8 carrying body cavity lymphoma cell lines.

Authors:  Rita Otvös; Henriette Skribek; Lorand L Kis; Annunziata Gloghini; Laszlo Markasz; Emilie Flaberg; Staffan Eksborg; Jozsef Konya; Lajos Gergely; Antonino Carbone; Laszlo Szekely
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.