Literature DB >> 18600301

Optimal modeling for phase I design of a two drug combination-results of a phase I study of cisplatin with 9-nitrocamptothecin.

S-J Lee1, M Gounder, E H Rubin, Jong Ming Li, Zheming Gu, A Thalasila, E Loyer, A P Kudelka, C F Verschraegen.   

Abstract

Combination of platinum with topoisomerase-I inhibitors are synergistic. The objectives of this study were to determine MTD range and toxicity profile of combinations of oral 9-nitrocamptothecin (9NC) and intravenous cisplatin in patients with refractory solid tumors. Each course was 28 days starting on day 1 with cisplatin, and then 9NC daily for 5 days/week for three weeks. A new two arm crossing design was created: patients in arm 1 were treated with at the single agent recommended dose of cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)), and increasing doses of 9NC and in arm 2 with the single agent recommended dose of 9NC (1.5 mg/day) and increasing dose of cisplatin. Once a dose limiting toxicity was observed, the dose of the escalated drug was decreased by one level, and the fixed-dose drug was then escalated. A 3 + 3 design was used. Eligibility criteria were standard for a phase I trial. Pharmacokinetics was performed. Eighteen patients were treated on Arm 1, 3 at the crossing level, and 33 on Arm 2. Dose limiting toxicities were gastrointestinal at the crossing dose level. After crossing, prolonged grade 3 thrombocytopenia was the DLT in arm 1, and grade 4 neutropenia in Arm 2. Only one patient with ovarian cancer had a partial remission, and 12 patients had disease stabilization (24% of clinical benefit). A Bayesian optimal dose finding was tested post-facto. The recommended doses for phase II studies by the 3 + 3 design are cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) and 9NC 1.25 mg/day and cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) and 9NC 2.0 mg/day. The Bayesian optimal dose finding suggested a different solution, closest to that of the latter dosing which may be less toxic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18600301     DOI: 10.1007/s10637-008-9147-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest New Drugs        ISSN: 0167-6997            Impact factor:   3.850


  25 in total

1.  Unconditional small-sample confidence intervals for the odds ratio.

Authors:  Alan Agresti; Yongyi Min
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Selecting drug combinations based on total equivalent dose (dose intensity)

Authors:  R Simon; E L Korn
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1990-09-19       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: comparison of the 1994 and 1997 American Society of Clinical Oncology surveys regarding ASCO clinical practice guidelines. Health Services Research Committee of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors:  C L Bennett; J A Weeks; M R Somerfield; J Feinglass; T J Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and metabolism of irinotecan (CPT-11).

Authors:  R H Mathijssen; R J van Alphen; J Verweij; W J Loos; K Nooter; G Stoter; A Sparreboom
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Phase II and pharmacologic study of weekly oral paclitaxel plus cyclosporine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C M F Kruijtzer; J H M Schellens; J Mezger; M E Scheulen; U Keilholz; J H Beijnen; H Rosing; R A A Mathôt; S Marcus; H van Tinteren; P Baas
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Pharmacokinetics of the in vivo and in vitro conversion of 9-nitro-20(S)-camptothecin to 9-amino-20(S)-camptothecin in humans, dogs, and mice.

Authors:  H R Hinz; N J Harris; E A Natelson; B C Giovanella
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Multicentre phase II and pharmacokinetic study of RFS2000 (9-nitro-camptothecin) administered orally 5 days a week in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  E Raymond; M Campone; R Stupp; J Menten; P Chollet; T Lesimple; R Fety-Deporte; D Lacombe; X Paoletti; P Fumoleau
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Identification of the metabolites of 9-nitro-20(S)-camptothecin in rats.

Authors:  Ke Li; Xiaoyan Chen; Dafang Zhong; Yan Li
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.922

9.  Differential effects of the breast cancer resistance protein on the cellular accumulation and cytotoxicity of 9-aminocamptothecin and 9-nitrocamptothecin.

Authors:  Rajeev Rajendra; Murugesan K Gounder; Ahamed Saleem; Jan H M Schellens; Douglas D Ross; Susan E Bates; Patrick Sinko; Eric H Rubin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  Oral chemotherapy: rationale and future directions.

Authors:  M D DeMario; M J Ratain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Camptothecin (CPT) and its derivatives are known to target topoisomerase I (Top1) as their mechanism of action: did we miss something in CPT analogue molecular targets for treating human disease such as cancer?

Authors:  Fengzhi Li; Tao Jiang; Qingyong Li; Xiang Ling
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 2.  Adaptive designs for dual-agent phase I dose-escalation studies.

Authors:  Jennifer A Harrington; Graham M Wheeler; Michael J Sweeting; Adrian P Mander; Duncan I Jodrell
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  A phase I study of the combination of temsirolimus with irinotecan for metastatic sarcoma.

Authors:  Claire F Verschraegen; Sujana Movva; Yongli Ji; Berndt Schmit; Robert H Quinn; Ben Liem; Therese Bocklage; Monte Shaheen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 6.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.