Literature DB >> 9917652

Bone repair and enhancement clinical trial design. Spine applications.

S D Boden1.   

Abstract

Spine fusion represents over half of all current bone grafting procedures. It is an important clinical area for bone augmentation because use even of the most successful graft material, autogenous iliac crest bone, is fraught with an unacceptably high failure rate. Various new options that biologically will control bone induction currently are under development. To prevent unnecessary clinical failures, it is important that surgeons understand the principles of clinical trial design, whether they actively are using the reported results or simply reviewing them in an effort to decide if they will use the new technology in their own practice. This review highlights the important issues relevant to designing a clinical trial for studying the efficacy of a bone augmentation product in a spine application. Some of the design challenges are generic, but others are unique to the spine because of difficulty in defining a clear diagnostic group, difficulty in noninvasively assessing the technical success of surgery, and frequent dissociation of the clinical and radiographic results.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9917652     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199810001-00033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Interbody metal implants ("cages") for lumbar fusion].

Authors:  G Freiherr von Salis-Soglio; R Scholz; K Seller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  2011 AOA Symposium: Tissue Engineering and Tissue Regeneration: AOA critical issues.

Authors:  Scott A Rodeo; Scott D Boden; Martha M Murray; Thomas A Einhorn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion with a dentate titanium cage: An experimental radiological and histopathological study in pigs.

Authors:  Pd Tsitsopoulos; Cha Tsonidis; Pph Tsitsopoulos; Ai Mintelis; DA Psalla; Ak Desiris
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.471

4.  In vivo preclinical evaluation of the influence of osteoporosis on the anchorage of different pedicle screw designs.

Authors:  Gianluca Giavaresi; Milena Fini; Roberto Giardino; Francesca Salamanna; Maria Sartori; Veronica Borsari; Silvia Spriano; Chiara M Bellini; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Comparative Efficacy of Commonly Available Human Bone Graft Substitutes as Tested for Posterolateral Fusion in an Athymic Rat Model.

Authors:  Neil Bhamb; Linda E A Kanim; Susan Drapeau; Suneeth Mohan; Erick Vasquez; Dan Shimko; William McKAY; Hyun W Bae
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-10-31

6.  Matched Comparison of Fusion Rates between Hydroxyapatite Demineralized Bone Matrix and Autograft in Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Dae Hwan Kim; Nam Lee; Dong Ah Shin; Seong Yi; Keung Nyun Kim; Yoon Ha
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-07-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.