Literature DB >> 9917639

Bone regeneration and fracture healing. Experience with distraction osteogenesis model.

M Richards1, J A Goulet, J A Weiss, N A Waanders, M B Schaffler, S A Goldstein.   

Abstract

The relation between physical forces and the processes of bone regeneration and healing remains incompletely understood. Gaps in understanding of these processes stem in part from models that produce inadequate amounts of new bone for study. Bone created through the use of distraction osteogenesis provides an attractive substrate for the study of mechanical forces and their effects on bone formation because this technique produces large volumes of new bone in a controlled fashion. The optimal mechanical environment in which bone formation occurs clinically has not been fully determined. In laboratory studies, however, the mechanical environment can be manipulated, and resultant changes in bone formation can be measured. To investigate how changes in strain environment influence patterns of bone formation, a bilateral New Zealand White rabbit model of bilateral distraction osteogensis was implemented. When a stiffener was applied to the external distractor, computation analyses predicted a sevenfold to eightfold decrease in all strain measures. These reductions in gap strains appeared to induce significant decreases in bone volume fraction and mean trabecular thickness. When osteotomies were created at a 30 degrees angle to the bony axis to generate more shear within the gap tissue, changes in the distribution of gap strains and resultant new bone architecture were observed. Specific correlations between changes in tissue level strains and the pattern of bone regeneration were seen in both experiments. These results provide direct in vivo evidence that pluripotential gap tissues are sensitive to their physical surroundings. Mechanisms responsible for this sensitivity might include vascularity, stem cell supply, and scaffolding architecture. The process of bone formation in distraction osteogenesis appears to be related to bone formation processes associated with more common conditions. The distraction osteogenesis model described suggests a mechanism for bone formation that seems applicable to other more common processes associated with bone formation, including fracture healing and impaired fracture healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9917639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  8 in total

Review 1.  Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Lisa R Amir; Vincent Everts; Antonius L J J Bronckers
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 2.  Adipose-derived stem cells in functional bone tissue engineering: lessons from bone mechanobiology.

Authors:  Josephine C Bodle; Ariel D Hanson; Elizabeth G Loboa
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  Effects of in vivo mechanical loading on large bone defect regeneration.

Authors:  Joel D Boerckel; Yash M Kolambkar; Hazel Y Stevens; Angela S P Lin; Kenneth M Dupont; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Mouse Digit Tip Regeneration Is Mechanical Load Dependent.

Authors:  Connor P Dolan; Felisha Imholt; Tae-Jung Yang; Rihana Bokhari; Joshua Gregory; Mingquan Yan; Osama Qureshi; Katherine Zimmel; Kirby M Sherman; Alyssa Falck; Ling Yu; Eric Leininger; Regina Brunauer; Larry J Suva; Dana Gaddy; Lindsay A Dawson; Ken Muneoka
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 6.390

5.  Expression of osteotropic growth factors and growth hormone receptor in a canine distraction osteogenesis model.

Authors:  Lars F H Theyse; Marja A Oosterlaken-Dijksterhuis; Jaap van Doorn; Maarten Terlou; Jan A Mol; George Voorhout; Herman A W Hazewinkel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.976

Review 6.  The biology of distraction osteogenesis for correction of mandibular and craniomaxillofacial defects: A review.

Authors:  Subodh Shankar Natu; Iqbal Ali; Sarwar Alam; Kolli Yada Giri; Anshita Agarwal; Vrishali Ajit Kulkarni
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-01

7.  Treatment of Micrognathia by Intraoral Distraction Osteogenesis: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  M Baskaran; S Gidean Arularasan; T K Divakar; Rohini Thirunavukkarasu
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017 Jan-Jun

8.  Tibial cortex transverse distraction in treating diabetic foot ulcers: what are we concerned about?

Authors:  Zhi-Qiang Fan; Zhi-Hao Yu; Jing-Zhou Zheng; Bao-Fu Yu; De-Wu Liu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.671

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.