Literature DB >> 9917411

The chaperonin GroEL binds to late-folding non-native conformations present in native Escherichia coli and murine dihydrofolate reductases.

A C Clark1, C Frieden.   

Abstract

Dihydrofolate reductases from mouse (MuDHFR) or Escherichia coli (EcDHFR) are shown to refold via several intermediate forms, each of which can bind to the chaperonin GroEL. When stable complexes with GroEL are formed, they consist of late-folding intermediates. In addition, we find that late-folding intermediates that are present in the native enzyme bind to GroEL. For the E. coli and murine proteins, the extent of protein bound increases as the temperature is increased from 8 degreesC to 42 degreesC, at which temperature either protein is completely bound as the last (EcDHFR) or the last two (MuDHFR) folding intermediate(s). Thus for EcDHFR, the binding is transient at low temperature (<30 degreesC) and stable at high temperature (>35 degreesC). For MuDHFR, complex formation appears less temperature dependent. In general, the data demonstrate that the overall binding free energy for the interaction of GroEL with native DHFR is the sum of the free energy for the first step in DHFR unfolding, which is unfavorable, and the free energy of binding the non-native conformation, which is favorable. For EcDHFR, this results in an overall binding free energy that is unfavorable below 30 degreesC. Over the temperature range of 8 degreesC to 42 degreesC, GroEL binds MuDHFR more tightly than EcDHFR, due partially to a small free energy difference between two pre-existing non-native conformations of MuDHFR, resulting in binding to more than one folding intermediate. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9917411     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  9 in total

1.  The mitochondrial Hsp70-dependent import system actively unfolds preproteins and shortens the lag phase of translocation.

Authors:  J H Lim; F Martin; B Guiard; N Pfanner; W Voos
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Chaperonin function: folding by forced unfolding.

Authors:  M Shtilerman; G H Lorimer; S W Englander
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-04-30       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  GroEL binds a late folding intermediate of phage P22 coat protein.

Authors:  M D de Beus; S M Doyle; C M Teschke
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.667

4.  Expansion and compression of a protein folding intermediate by GroEL.

Authors:  Zong Lin; Hays S Rye
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-10-08       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Factors governing the substrate recognition by GroEL chaperone: a sequence correlation approach.

Authors:  Tapan K Chaudhuri; Prateek Gupta
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.667

6.  Cooperative effects of potassium, magnesium, and magnesium-ADP on the release of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase from the chaperonin GroEL.

Authors:  A C Clark; B S Karon; C Frieden
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Coupling between protein folding and allostery in the GroE chaperonin system.

Authors:  O Yifrach; A Horovitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Protein quality control acts on folding intermediates to shape the effects of mutations on organismal fitness.

Authors:  Shimon Bershtein; Wanmeng Mu; Adrian W R Serohijos; Jingwen Zhou; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Probing the kinetic stabilities of Friedreich's ataxia clinical variants using a solid phase GroEL chaperonin capture platform.

Authors:  Ana R Correia; Subhashchandra Naik; Mark T Fisher; Cláudio M Gomes
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2014-10-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.