Literature DB >> 9915535

An open, minimally invasive approach to the lumbar spine.

C J Dewald1, K W Millikan, K W Hammerberg, A Doolas, R L Dewald.   

Abstract

A minimum 2-year follow-up retrospective review was undertaken to assess our experience with an anterior paramedian muscle-sparing approach to the lumbar spine for anterior spinal fusion (ASF). The records of 28 patients (November 1991 through January 1996) undergoing ASF via a left lower quadrant transverse skin incision (6-10 cm) with a paramedian anterior rectus fascial Z-plasty retroperitoneal approach were reviewed. Diagnosis, number, and level of lumbar interspaces fused, types of fusion, estimated blood loss, length of procedure, length of hospital stay, and complications were analyzed. All cases were completed as either a same-day anterior/posterior (24 of 28) or as a staged procedure at least 1 week after posterior fusion (4 of 28). The General Surgery service performed the muscle-sparing approach, whereas the Orthopedic Spine service performed the ASF. There were 14 men and 14 women, with a mean age of 35.5 years (range, 11-52 years). Diagnoses included spondylolisthesis in 20 cases (including four grade III or IV slips), segmental instability (degenerative or postsurgical) in 7, and 1 flatback deformity. A single level was fused in 20 cases (L4/5 in 4 and L5/S1 in 16), two levels were fused in 5 cases (L4/5 and L5/S1) and three levels were fused in 2 cases (L3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1). The mean length of stay was 7.4 days (range, 5-12 days). The mean estimated blood loss was 300 mL for the anterior procedure alone and 700 ml for both anterior/posterior procedures on the same day. The mean length of operating room time for the anterior approach and fusion was 117 minutes (range, 60-330 minutes). Posterior instrumentation was used in all cases. Anterior interbody struts used included 19 autogenous tricortical grafts, 4 fresh-frozen allografts (2 femoral rings and 2 iliac crests), 3 carbon fiber cages packed with autogenous bone, and a Harms titanium cage with autograft. There was one L5 corpectomy for which a large tricortical allograft strut was utilized. There were no vascular, visceral, or urinary tract injuries. In three cases a mild ileus developed, which resolved spontaneously. We conclude that the anterior paramedian muscle-sparing retroperitoneal approach is safe, uses a small skin incision, avoids cutting abdominal wall musculature, and allows for multiple-level anterior spinal fusions by a variety of interbody fusion techniques. This approach does not require transperitoneal violation or added endoscopic instrumentation, nor does it limit fusion level and technique of fusion, as is the case with the recently popularized laparoscopic approach to the lumbar spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9915535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of conventional versus minimally invasive extraperitoneal approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  V Saraph; C Lerch; N Walochnik; C M Bach; M Krismer; C Wimmer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-05-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Mini-open approach for direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Chong-Suh Lee; Sung-Soo Chung; Young-Ryeol Pae; Se-Jun Park
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-08-19

3.  [Minimally invasive anterior approaches to the lumbosacral junction].

Authors:  Andreas Korge; Christoph Siepe; Christoph Mehren; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 4.  Clinical presentation and surgical anatomy of sympathetic nerve injury during lumbar spine surgery: a narrative review.

Authors:  Bradley Brickman; Mina Tanios; Devon Patel; Hossein Elgafy
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-06

5.  Infraumbilical anterior retroperitoneal exposure of the lumbar spine in 128 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Luke Brewster; Nathan Trueger; Carol Schermer; Alex Ghanayem; John Santaniello
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Description of a transosseous approach to the L5-S1 disc and 2 clinical case reports.

Authors:  Michael MacMillan; John McCormick; James W Rice
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2012-12-01

7.  Two-year clinical and radiographic success of minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach for the treatment of degenerative lumbar conditions.

Authors:  Burak M Ozgur; Vijay Agarwal; Erin Nail; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2010-06-01

8.  How do validated measures of functional outcome compare with commonly used outcomes in administrative database research for lumbar spinal surgery?

Authors:  Daniel Omoto; S Samuel Bederman; Albert J M Yee; Hans J Kreder; Joel A Finkelstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Mini-open anterior spine surgery for anterior lumbar diseases.

Authors:  Ruey-Mo Lin; Kuo-Yuan Huang; Kuo-An Lai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Midline extraperitoneal approach for bilateral widespread retroperitoneal abscess originating from anorectal infection.

Authors:  Koji Okuda; Yuka Oshima; Kentaro Saito; Takahiro Uesaka; Yasunobu Terasaki; Hironori Kasai; Nozomi Minagawa; Takahiro Oshima; Yumi Okawa; Kazuhito Misawa
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-12-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.