Literature DB >> 9915442

A comparison of noncontrast computerized tomography with excretory urography in the assessment of acute flank pain.

O Niall1, J Russell, R MacGregor, H Duncan, J Mullins.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compare noncontrast enhanced computerized tomography (CT) and excretory urography (IVP) in the evaluation of acute flank pain.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 consecutive patients presenting to the emergency department with acute flank pain were evaluated with noncontrast CT, films of the kidneys, ureters and bladder, and IVP. The patients were treated according to the clinical picture. All 40 sets of evaluations were later assessed randomly by an independent consultant radiologist for the presence, size and location of a stone, ureteral dilatation and secondary signs of ureteral obstruction.
RESULTS: Of 40 patients 12 had no calculus and 28 had a calculus confirmed on removal or documented passage of a stone. Absence of a stone was based on clinical and radiological followup with clinical resolution. CT revealed all 28 calculi and no calculus in 11 of 12 patients with 100% sensitivity and 92% specificity. IVP demonstrated 18 calculi (64% sensitivity) and no calculus in 11 of 12 patients (92% specificity). Ureteral obstruction was seen in 28 of the 40 patients, and CT and IVP were equivalent in detection (100% sensitivity). Films of the kidneys, ureters and bladder alone demonstrated 15 of 28 stones (54% sensitivity).
CONCLUSIONS: Noncontrast CT is an accurate, safe, rapid technique to assess acute flank pain, and the evaluation of choice for patients who would otherwise require IVP for diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9915442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  30 in total

1.  [Infectious diseases and injuries of bladder and urinary tract].

Authors:  J Budjan; P Riffel; M M Ong; C Bolenz; S O Schönberg; S Haneder
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Diagnosis of acute flank pain caused by ureteral stones: value of combined direct and indirect signs on IVU and unenhanced helical CT.

Authors:  Li-Jen Wang; Chip-Jin Ng; Jih-Chang Chen; Te-Fa Chiu; Yon-Cheong Wong
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Current status of low dose multi-detector CT in the urinary tract.

Authors:  Mi Kim Sung; Sarabjeet Singh; Mannudeep K Kalra
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-28

4.  [The impact of ultrasound in urology].

Authors:  G Schöppler; J Heinzelbecker; H J Michaely; D Dinter; D-A Clevert; A E Pelzer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Quantitation of stone burden: imaging advances.

Authors:  Terri J Vrtiska
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-11-13

Review 6.  [Imaging techniques and their impact in treatment management of patients with acute flank pain].

Authors:  A Grosse; C A Grosse; J Mauermann; G Heinz-Peer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Pediatric Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and CT vs IVP for Flank Pain Diagnosis.

Authors:  M A Beaghler
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  1999

Review 8.  [Urolithiasis 2016 : Reliable, effective and low radiation exposure].

Authors:  A Neisius; C Thomas; F C Roos; W Jäger; I Tsaur; G Bartsch; T Knoll; A Haferkamp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Imaging the urologic patient: the utility of intravenous pyelogram in the CT scan era.

Authors:  Zachary Hale; Emily Hanna; Makito Miyake; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Unenhanced spiral CT in acute ureteral colic: a replacement for excretory urography?

Authors:  J A Ryu; B Kim; Y H Jeon; J Lee; J W Lee; S S Jeon; K H Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.