PURPOSE: To optimize followup in patients with stage I nonseminomatous testis cancer on surveillance we evaluated the contribution of each followup modality to the detection of progression as well as morbidity and mortality outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After orchiectomy 170 patients with clinical stage I nonseminoma were prospectively placed on a surveillance protocol. History, physical examination, serum tumor markers, abdominal and pelvic computerized tomography (CT), and chest x-ray were used for followup. The number of failures, methods and timing of progression detection, treatments required, mortality rate and subsequent contralateral primary tumors were recorded. RESULTS: The 170 surveillance patients were followed a median of 6.3 years. Within 2 years (median 6.9 months) postoperatively 48 patients (28.2%) had disease progression. History, physical examination, markers, CT and chest radiography provided the initial evidence of progression in 18 (37.5%), 34 (70.8%), 34 (70.8%), and 4 (8.3%) patients, respectively. Each modality was the only indicator of failure in 2 (4.2%), 4 (8.3%), 10 (20.8%) and 0 cases, respectively. Of the 170 patients 122 (71.8%) required no additional treatment beyond orchiectomy, 26 (15.3%) received 1 and 22 (12.9%) underwent more than 1 therapeutic modality. Only 1 patient (0.6%) died of disease. Contralateral tumors developed in 5 cases (2.9%) therapeutic a mean of 8.1 years after orchiectomy. CONCLUSIONS: In stage I nonseminoma patients, surveillance history, physical examination, tumor markers and abdominopelvic CT are necessary components of the followup protocol. Removal of routine chest x-ray from the protocol would not have changed progression detection. The initial surveillance visit must occur by 2 months postoperatively. Patients should be followed beyond 5 years and likely for life in addition to regular patient self-examination.
PURPOSE: To optimize followup in patients with stage I nonseminomatous testis cancer on surveillance we evaluated the contribution of each followup modality to the detection of progression as well as morbidity and mortality outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After orchiectomy 170 patients with clinical stage I nonseminoma were prospectively placed on a surveillance protocol. History, physical examination, serum tumor markers, abdominal and pelvic computerized tomography (CT), and chest x-ray were used for followup. The number of failures, methods and timing of progression detection, treatments required, mortality rate and subsequent contralateral primary tumors were recorded. RESULTS: The 170 surveillance patients were followed a median of 6.3 years. Within 2 years (median 6.9 months) postoperatively 48 patients (28.2%) had disease progression. History, physical examination, markers, CT and chest radiography provided the initial evidence of progression in 18 (37.5%), 34 (70.8%), 34 (70.8%), and 4 (8.3%) patients, respectively. Each modality was the only indicator of failure in 2 (4.2%), 4 (8.3%), 10 (20.8%) and 0 cases, respectively. Of the 170 patients 122 (71.8%) required no additional treatment beyond orchiectomy, 26 (15.3%) received 1 and 22 (12.9%) underwent more than 1 therapeutic modality. Only 1 patient (0.6%) died of disease. Contralateral tumors developed in 5 cases (2.9%) therapeutic a mean of 8.1 years after orchiectomy. CONCLUSIONS: In stage I nonseminomapatients, surveillance history, physical examination, tumor markers and abdominopelvic CT are necessary components of the followup protocol. Removal of routine chest x-ray from the protocol would not have changed progression detection. The initial surveillance visit must occur by 2 months postoperatively. Patients should be followed beyond 5 years and likely for life in addition to regular patient self-examination.
Authors: Madhur Nayan; Michael A S Jewett; Lynn Anson-Cartwright; Philippe L Bedard; Malcolm Moore; Peter Chung; Padraig Warde; Joan Sweet; Martin O'Malley; Robert J Hamilton Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2016 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Peter J Gariscsak; Lynn Anson-Cartwright; Eshetu G Atenafu; Di Maria Jiang; Peter Chung; Philippe Bedard; Padraig Warde; Martin O'Malley; Joan Sweet; Rachel M Glicksman; Robert J Hamilton Journal: Eur Urol Open Sci Date: 2022-04-27
Authors: Clare Moynihan; Andy R Norman; Yolanda Barbachano; Louise Burchell; Robert Huddart; David P Dearnaley; Alan Horwich Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-03-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: N J van As; D C Gilbert; J Money-Kyrle; D Bloomfield; S Beesley; D P Dearnaley; A Horwich; R A Huddart Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2008-06-17 Impact factor: 7.640