Literature DB >> 9915140

Distinct cytogenetic alterations in squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix revealed by laser-assisted microdissection and comparative genomic hybridization.

M Aubele1, H Zitzelsberger, U Schenck, A Walch, H Höfler, M Werner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been established that comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) on Papanicolaou-stained cervical smears can be used to identify chromosomal imbalances.
METHODS: In this study, the authors identified normal and dysplastic squamous epithelial cells cytologically, eliminated surrounding bacteria or leukocytes by a ultraviolet laser microbeam under microscopic control, and scraped out the cell groups of interest by a microdissection system. In 3 cases of squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL), a total of 9 samples of dysplastic (n = 6) and nontumorous cells (n = 3) were investigated, each of them consisting of 3-40 cells. The DNA was amplified by degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR (DOP-PCR) and used for CGH.
RESULTS: Analyses of all nontumorous cell groups resulted in fluorescence ratio profiles that showed no deviation from the normal range, confirming that no methodologic artefacts have been produced. The CGH profiles from dysplastic cells, however, showed various chromosomal imbalances affecting six to nine different chromosomes. The most frequent gains in DNA were observed on chromosomes 1p, 2q, 4, and 5, whereas losses were found on chromosomes 6q and 13q.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate the feasibility and reliability of CGH on microdissected cell samples of routinely processed cervical smears. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study reporting the use of CGH on cervical routine smears. This approach offers the opportunity to investigate sequence copy number changes in small, morphologically well-defined groups of dysplastic cells. It may, therefore, serve as a cytogenetic screening test for identifying chromosomal aberrations in precancerous lesions that are associated with a high risk for progression to invasive cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9915140     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19981225)84:6<375::aid-cncr10>3.0.co;2-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  9 in total

1.  Laser-assisted microdissection of membrane-mounted paraffin sections for polymerase chain reaction analysis: identification of cell populations using immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization.

Authors:  L M Gjerdrum; I Lielpetere; L M Rasmussen; K Bendix; S Hamilton-Dutoit
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 2.  Laser capture microdissection: Big data from small samples.

Authors:  Soma Datta; Lavina Malhotra; Ryan Dickerson; Scott Chaffee; Chandan K Sen; Sashwati Roy
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 3.  Laser capture microdissection in pathology.

Authors:  F Fend; M Raffeld
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Analysis of genetic copy number changes in cervical disease progression.

Authors:  Frank A Policht; Minghao Song; Svetlana Sitailo; Anna O'Hare; Raheela Ashfaq; Carolyn Y Muller; Larry E Morrison; Walter King; Irina A Sokolova
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Chromosomal aberrations accumulate in polyploid cells of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL).

Authors:  Gábor Méhes; Norbert Speich; Magdolna Bollmann; Reinhard Bollmann
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2004-09-25       Impact factor: 3.201

6.  [Laser microdissection and molecular typing of dysplastic cells from Pap smears: a new approach to early detection of cervical cancer].

Authors:  C Eder; R S K Chaganti; V V V S Murty; K-R Greskötter; M Giesing
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.011

7.  Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Judith N Kloth; Jan Oosting; Tom van Wezel; Karoly Szuhai; Jeroen Knijnenburg; Arko Gorter; Gemma G Kenter; Gert Jan Fleuren; Ekaterina S Jordanova
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Progressive genetic aberrations detected by comparative genomic hybridization in squamous cell cervical cancer.

Authors:  D G Allen; D J White; A M Hutchins; J P Scurry; S N Tabrizi; S M Garland; J E Armes
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Evaluation of the reliability of chromosomal imbalances detected by combined use of universal DNA amplification and comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  T Harada; K Shiraishi; N Kusano; K Umayahara; S Kondoh; K Okita; K Sasaki
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  2000-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.