Literature DB >> 990703

The value of preliminary bone scanning in staging and assessing the prognosis of breast cancer.

D J Campbell, A J Banks, G D Oates.   

Abstract

Preliminary bone scans have been performed on all patients with early breast cancer. The incidence of positive scans has been recorded and several factors determining scan status have been enumerated. Particular attention has been focused on the natrual history of scan positive and scan negative patients. Eighteen per cent of stage I and 41 per cent of stage II cancers had positive bone scans. Scan results were correlated with age, menopausal status, tumour position, tumour size and histological node status. Postmenopausal patients were found to have a significantly increased risk of being scan positive (P less than 0-01). Follow-up studies have confirmed that the lesions demonstrated by scanning actually represent metastatic foci. At 18 months 85-7 per cent of scan positive patients had evidence of disseminated disease compared with only 11-4 per cent of scan negative patients (P less than 0-01). Clinically overt advanced disease evolves from positive scan lesions. It is clear that a significant percentage of patients felt to have early breast cancer already have widely disseminated disease at the initial presentation. The biological significance of bone scan lesions makes a sensitive screening test for dissemination an essential part of the preliminary assessment of patients with breast cancer. Bone scans provide an excellent prognostic index at a patient's initial assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 990703     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800631020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  8 in total

1.  Skeletal scintigraphy in carcinoma of the breast.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-09-03

2.  Review of general surgery 1976.

Authors:  H Ellis
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Baseline staging tests in primary breast cancer: a practice guideline.

Authors:  R E Myers; M Johnston; K Pritchard; M Levine; T Oliver
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Routine bone scanning in patients with T1 and T2 breast cancer: a waste of money.

Authors:  K A Yeh; L Fortunato; J A Ridge; J P Hoffman; B L Eisenberg; E R Sigurdson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Radionuclide evaluation of skeletal metastases: practical considerations.

Authors:  R H Gold; L W Bassett
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  CA15-3: a reliable indicator of metastatic bone disease in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  D P O'Brien; P G Horgan; D B Gough; R Skehill; H Grimes; H F Given
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 7.  Skeletal scintigraphy.

Authors:  I R McDougall
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1979-06

8.  Problems associated with the detection of skeletal metastases.

Authors:  C S Galasko
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 18.000

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.