Literature DB >> 3941915

Radionuclide evaluation of skeletal metastases: practical considerations.

R H Gold, L W Bassett.   

Abstract

The indications for radionuclide bone scanning to evaluate possible metastatic disease are reviewed. The causes of false-positive and false-negative interpretations are discussed and illustrated. Since breast cancer leads all malignant tumors in incidence of skeletal metastases found at autopsy, the efficacy of preoperative bone scans in patients with breast cancer is analyzed in detail. A routine preoperative bone scan for patients with Stage I breast cancer produces negligible immediate benefits, but may serve a useful purpose as a baseline to enhance the detection of subtle changes that could represent metastases in a subsequent scan. However, the clinical usefulness of this screening procedure for Stage I disease must be balanced with its cost. Clinical Stage II is a grey area and may include patients with large primary tumors and axillary nodal involvement, implying a greater chance for the occurrence of skeletal metastases and hence a significant yield in bone scans. Patients with clinical Stages III or IV disease have the greatest chance of harboring metastases and should have an extensive diagnostic evaluation including bone scans prior to definitive treatment. Selected radiographs of sites of abnormally increased radionuclide activity and an anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis should be correlated with the scan to permit a single comprehensive diagnostic impression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3941915     DOI: 10.1007/bf00355065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  13 in total

1.  Bone scintiscanning in the initial assessment of carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  B C Lentle; P E Burns; H Dierich; F I Jackson
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1975-07

2.  Staging breast cancer: role of bone scanning.

Authors:  C J Davies; P A Griffiths; B J Preston; A H Morris; C W Elston; R W Blamey
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-09-03

3.  Efficacy of preoperative and postoperative bone scanning in the management of breast carcinoma.

Authors:  F H Gerber; J J Goodreau; P T Kirchner; W J Fouty
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-08-11       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Radioactive technetium phosphate bone scanning in preoperative assessment and follow-up study of patients with primary cancer of the breast.

Authors:  D L Citrin; C M Furnival; R G Bessent; W R Greig; G Bell; L H Blumgart
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1976-09

5.  Bone scanning. Its value in the preoperative evaluation of patients with suspicious breast masses.

Authors:  H C Hoffman; R Marty
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Bone scanning in osseous metastatic disease.

Authors:  R E O'Mara
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1974-09-30       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The detection of skeletal metastases from mammary cancer by gamma camera scintigraphy.

Authors:  C S Galasko
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Rationale for the use of bone scans in selected metastatic and primary bone tumors.

Authors:  B J McNeil
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

9.  Solitary abnormalities in bone scans of patients with extraosseous malignancies.

Authors:  R J Corcoran; J H Thrall; R W Kyle; R J Kaminski; M C Johnson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  The value of preliminary bone scanning in staging and assessing the prognosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  D J Campbell; A J Banks; G D Oates
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  2 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging and scintigraphy in patients with metastatic breast cancer of the axial skeleton: a comparative study.

Authors:  Mehmet Halit Yilmaz; Mustafa Ozguroglu; Devrim Mert; Hande Turna; Gökhan Demir; Ibrahim Adaletli; Sila Ulus; Metin Halac; Kaya Kanberoğlu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Differentiation of malignant and degenerative bone lesions using dexamethasone interventional 3- and 24-hour bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  A Bhatnagar; A Mondal; R Kashyap; R K Sharma; R Sharma; S K Chakravarty; V Bihari; K Sawroop; M K Chopra; N L Soni
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.