Literature DB >> 9894402

Sensitivity to discontinuous dependencies in language learners: evidence for limitations in processing space.

L M Santelmann1, P W Jusczyk.   

Abstract

Five experiments using the Headturn Preference Procedure examined 15- and 18-month-old children's sensitivity to morphosyntactic dependencies in English. In each experiment, the children were exposed to two types of passages. Passages in the experimental condition contained a well-formed English dependency between the auxiliary verb is and a main verb with the ending -ing. Passages in the control condition contained an ungrammatical combination of the modal auxiliary can and a main verb with the ending -ing. In the experiments, the distance between the dependent morphemes was systematically varied by inserting an adverbial of a specified length between the auxiliary and main verbs. The results indicated that 18-month-olds are sensitive to the basic relationship between is and -ing, but that 15-month-olds are not. The 18-month-olds, but not the 15-month-olds, listened significantly longer to the passages with the well-formed English dependency. In addition, the 18-month-olds showed this preference for the well-formed dependency only over a limited domain of 1-3 syllables. Over domains of 4-5 syllables, they showed no significant preference for the experimental over the control passages. These findings indicate that 18-month-olds can track relationships between functor morphemes. Additionally, these findings are consistent with the hypothesis that 18-month-olds are working with a limited processing window, and that they are only picking up relevant dependencies that fall within this window.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9894402     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00060-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  23 in total

1.  Does the mastery of center-embedded linguistic structures distinguish humans from nonhuman primates?

Authors:  Pierre Perruchet; Arnaud Rey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

2.  Toddlers Activate Lexical Semantic Knowledge in the Absence of Visual Referents: Evidence from Auditory Priming.

Authors:  Jon A Willits; Erica H Wojcik; Mark S Seidenberg; Jenny R Saffran
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2013-11

3.  Abstract rule learning in 11- and 14-month-old infants.

Authors:  Elena Koulaguina; Rushen Shi
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-02

4.  Input Variability Facilitates Unguided Subcategory Learning in Adults.

Authors:  Sunniva Sørhus Eidsvåg; Margit Austad; Elena Plante; Arve E Asbjørnsen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Statistical learning and language acquisition.

Authors:  Alexa R Romberg; Jenny R Saffran
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-11

6.  Increasing Flexibility in Children's Online Processing of Grammatical and Nonce Determiners in Fluent Speech.

Authors:  Renate Zangl; Anne Fernald
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2007

7.  Names in frames: infants interpret words in sentence frames faster than words in isolation.

Authors:  Anne Fernald; Nereyda Hurtado
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2006-05

8.  A role for the developing lexicon in phonetic category acquisition.

Authors:  Naomi H Feldman; Thomas L Griffiths; Sharon Goldwater; James L Morgan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Twelve-month-old infants benefit from prior experience in statistical learning.

Authors:  Jill Lany; Rebecca L Gómez
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-12

10.  Reply to comment on "Nonadjacent dependency processing in monkeys, apes, and humans".

Authors:  Stuart K Watson; Judith M Burkart; Steven J Schapiro; Susan P Lambeth; Jutta L Mueller; Simon W Townsend
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.