Literature DB >> 9893138

Comparison of mortality in ESRD patients on convective and diffusive extracorporeal treatments. The Registro Lombardo Dialisi E Trapianto.

F Locatelli, D Marcelli, F Conte, A Limido, F Malberti, D Spotti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of convective [hemodiafiltration (HDF) or hemofiltration (HF)] versus diffusive treatments [hemodialysis (HD)] on end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patient mortality and dialysis-related amyloidosis (DRA) using data from the Lombardy Registry.
METHODS: For this purpose, 6, 444 patients (aged 56.4 +/- 15.6 years, females 39.5%, diabetics 10. 6%) who started renal replacement therapy (RRT) on HD, HDF, or HF between 1983 and 1995 were considered. A total of 1,082 patients were treated with HDF or HF (first choice in the case of 188), with a median follow-up of 29.7 months. The median follow-up of the 6,298 patients on HD (first choice in the case of 6256) was 22.4 months. The time of survival on dialysis to carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) surgery was evaluated as a hard marker of DRA morbidity. Survival was compared by means of the Cox proportional regression hazards model, using CTS surgery and all deaths as events for morbidity and mortality, respectively. Explanatory covariates were age, gender, and comorbidities; dialysis modality was tested as a time-dependent covariate.
RESULTS: The relative risk (RR) for CTS surgery was significantly higher in older patients [RR = 1.04 per year of age on admission to RRT, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 1.06; P = 0. 0001], in diabetics (RR = 2.63, 95% CI 1.30 to 5.31; P = 0.0007), and in patients with heart disease (RR = 5.36, 95% CI 2.27 to 12.68 P = 0.0001). Adjusting for age and diabetic status, the RR for CTS surgery was 42% lower in the patients treated with HDF or HF (RR = 0. 58, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.95, P = 0.03). The RR for mortality, adjusted for age, gender, and comorbidities, was 10% lower in patients treated with HDF or HF (RR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.06; P = NS).
CONCLUSION: These results support the hypothesis that convective treatments are associated with a nonsignificant trend toward better survival and significantly delay the need for CTS surgery. An older age and the presence of diabetes and heart disease are other important risk factors for CTS surgery. These results could have an important clinical impact given the relevance of DRA in dialysis patient morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9893138     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00236.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  20 in total

1.  Internal filtration in dialyzers with different membrane permeabilities.

Authors:  Yuichi Sato; Kenjiro Kimura; Tatsuya Chikaraishi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  Hemodiafiltration to Address Unmet Medical Needs ESKD Patients.

Authors:  Bernard Canaud; Jörg Vienken; Stephen Ash; Richard A Ward
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  Evidence-based cardiology in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Michael Allon
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Arteriovenous fistulas and digital hypoperfusion ischemic syndrome in patients on hemodialysis.

Authors:  Radojica V Stolic; Goran Z Trajkovic; Dijana J Miric; Bojana Kisic; Zorana Djordjevic; Goran Lj Azanjac; Marijana S Stanojevic; Dragica Z Stolic
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2013-05-06

5.  High-efficiency postdilution online hemodiafiltration reduces all-cause mortality in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Francisco Maduell; Francesc Moreso; Mercedes Pons; Rosa Ramos; Josep Mora-Macià; Jordi Carreras; Jordi Soler; Ferran Torres; Josep M Campistol; Alberto Martinez-Castelao
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Hemodiafiltration beneficially affects QT interval duration and dispersion compared to hemodialysis.

Authors:  Kitti Barta; Árpád Czifra; Csaba Kun; Alida Páll; Julianna Kulcsár; György Paragh; István Lőrincz; Tamás János Padra; Anupam Agarwal; Abolfazl Zarjou; Zarjou Abolfazl; József Balla; Zoltán Szabó
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 2.801

7.  Hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration reduce intradialytic hypotension in ESRD.

Authors:  Francesco Locatelli; Paolo Altieri; Simeone Andrulli; Piergiorgio Bolasco; Giovanna Sau; Luciano A Pedrini; Carlo Basile; Salvatore David; Mariano Feriani; Giovanni Montagna; Biagio Raffaele Di Iorio; Bruno Memoli; Raffaella Cravero; Giovanni Battaglia; Carmine Zoccali
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 10.121

8.  Long-term outcomes in online hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Enric Vilar; Andrew C Fry; David Wellsted; James E Tattersall; Roger N Greenwood; Ken Farrington
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Hemodiafiltration and hemodialysis differently affect P wave duration and dispersion on the surface electrocardiogram.

Authors:  Alida Páll; Árpád Czifra; Veronika Sebestyén; Gergely Becs; Csaba Kun; József Balla; György Paragh; István Lőrincz; Dénes Páll; Tamás János Padra; Anupam Agarwal; Abolfazl Zarjou; Zoltán Szabó
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Optimization of dialysate bicarbonate in patients treated with online haemodiafiltration.

Authors:  Enrique Montagud-Marrahi; Jose Broseta; Diana Rodriguez-Espinosa; Rodas Lidia; Evelyn Hermida-Lama; Marc Xipell; Marta Arias-Guillén; Nestor Fontseré; Manel Vera; Josep Lluis Bedini; Naira Rico; Francisco Maduell
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2020-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.