Literature DB >> 9892894

Perceptions of bed rest by women with high-risk pregnancies: A comparison between home and hospital.

M Heaman1, A Gupton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bed rest at home or in the hospital is a commonly prescribed treatment for women experiencing complications of pregnancy. This focused ethnographic study examined bed rest from the high-risk pregnant woman's perspective and compared perceptions of women cared for in the home with those in hospital.
METHODS: A convenience sample of 24 pregnant women who had been on bed rest for at least seven days was recruited from the antepartum unit of a tertiary care hospital and from an antepartum home care program in western Canada. Data were collected in 1994 through interviews and participant diaries. Content analysis was used to identify themes.
RESULTS: Bed rest had a significant emotional and social impact on pregnant women and their families in both settings. Overall, bed rest in hospital seemed to be associated with more sources of stress than at home. In hospital, women had to cope with separation from home and family, lack of privacy, hospital discomforts, and incompatible roommates, whereas women at home struggled with role reversal and the temptation to do more activity than was recommended. Stressors not unique to but exacerbated by hospitalization included concerns about the children, a sense of missing out, a sense of confinement and being a prisoner, boredom, feelings of depression and loneliness, and negative impact on the relationship with their partner.
CONCLUSION: Study findings raise questions about the appropriateness of routine prescription of bed rest. Health care professionals should propose and develop home care programs as an alternative to antepartum hospitalization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9892894     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.1998.00252.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  6 in total

1.  Lack of evidence for prescription of antepartum bed rest.

Authors:  Judith A Maloni
Journal:  Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-07-01

2.  An analysis of antenatal hospitalization in Canada, 1991-2003.

Authors:  Shiliang Liu; Maureen Heaman; Reg Sauve; Robert Liston; Francesca Reyes; Sharon Bartholomew; David Young; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-11-07

3.  Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #50: The role of activity restriction in obstetric management: (Replaces Consult Number 33, August 2014).

Authors:  Jhenette Lauder; Anthony Sciscione; Joseph Biggio; Sarah Osmundson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Addressing Perinatal Mental Health Risk within a Fetal Care Center.

Authors:  Lacy Chavis; Tiffany Willis; Jeannie Zuk; Allison G Dempsey; Joanna C M Cole
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2021-03

5.  Pet therapy program for antepartum high-risk pregnancies: a pilot study.

Authors:  C E Lynch; E F Magann; S N Barringer; S T Ounpraseuth; D G Eastham; S D Lewis; Z N Stowe
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 6.  Loneliness in pregnant and postpartum people and parents of children aged 5 years or younger: a scoping review.

Authors:  Jacqueline Kent-Marvick; Sara Simonsen; Ryoko Pentecost; Eliza Taylor; Mary M McFarland
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-09-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.