OBJECTIVE: The objective of our investigation was to determine whether an MR imaging system designed to obtain images of the extremities affects the safety and functionality of pacemakers or that of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ex vivo experiments were conducted in which seven pacemakers and seven ICDs were exposed to a 0.2-T extremity MR imaging system. Magnetic field attraction was assessed at three positions relative to the MR imaging system. In addition, the devices were placed into a test apparatus that was oriented parallel and perpendicular relative to the MR imaging system while imaging was performed on a phantom using T1-weighted spin-echo and gradient-echo sequences. Various functional aspects of the pacemakers and ICDs were evaluated before, during (pacemakers only), and after MR imaging. RESULTS: Magnetic field attraction was relatively minor for all devices. The quality of the MR images was unaffected by the devices. Operation of this MR system did not alter any of the functional aspects of the pacemakers or ICDs evaluated in this study. CONCLUSION: According to these data and in consideration of how patients are positioned during examinations--that is, positioned so that the thorax (where the pacemaker or ICD and the corresponding leads are located) does not enter the magnet bore--the results suggest that it should be safe to perform MR imaging in patients with the pacemakers and ICDs evaluated in this study.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of our investigation was to determine whether an MR imaging system designed to obtain images of the extremities affects the safety and functionality of pacemakers or that of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ex vivo experiments were conducted in which seven pacemakers and seven ICDs were exposed to a 0.2-T extremity MR imaging system. Magnetic field attraction was assessed at three positions relative to the MR imaging system. In addition, the devices were placed into a test apparatus that was oriented parallel and perpendicular relative to the MR imaging system while imaging was performed on a phantom using T1-weighted spin-echo and gradient-echo sequences. Various functional aspects of the pacemakers and ICDs were evaluated before, during (pacemakers only), and after MR imaging. RESULTS: Magnetic field attraction was relatively minor for all devices. The quality of the MR images was unaffected by the devices. Operation of this MR system did not alter any of the functional aspects of the pacemakers or ICDs evaluated in this study. CONCLUSION: According to these data and in consideration of how patients are positioned during examinations--that is, positioned so that the thorax (where the pacemaker or ICD and the corresponding leads are located) does not enter the magnet bore--the results suggest that it should be safe to perform MR imaging in patients with the pacemakers and ICDs evaluated in this study.
Authors: Ariel Roguin; Menekhem M Zviman; Glenn R Meininger; E Rene Rodrigues; Timm M Dickfeld; David A Bluemke; Albert Lardo; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Henry R Halperin Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-07-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Peter Thomas Burke; Hamid Ghanbari; Patrick B Alexander; Michael K Shaw; Marcos Daccarett; Christian Machado Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2010-01-29 Impact factor: 1.900