Literature DB >> 9888194

Results of cochlear implantation in patients with severe to profound hearing loss--implications for patient selection.

J Kiefer1, C von Ilberg, B Reimer, R Knecht, V Gall, G Diller, E Stürzebecher, T Pfennigdorff, A Spelsberg.   

Abstract

In patients with some residual hearing and minor benefit from conventional hearing aids, the benefits of cochlear implantation have to be weighed carefully against eventual adverse effects. In this study, pre- and post-operative thresholds as well as functional results after cochlear implantation are reported; 17 of 44 implanted adults had residual hearing pre-operatively (mean threshold(250 to 4000 Hz): 106 dB HL) in the implanted ear. Residual hearing in the implanted ear could not, in general, be preserved post-operatively. Seventeen of 44 implanted children had some amount of residual hearing in the implanted ear pre-operatively (implanted ear: 114 dB HL; contralateral ear: 109.9 dB HL; mean thresholds(250 to 4000 Hz))). Contrary to the results in adults, residual hearing in the implanted ear remained statistically unchanged. Hearing in the contralateral ear increased significantly from 109.9 to 101.9 dB HL post-operatively. This increase was mainly attributed to maturation of the central auditory pathway. In adults with residual hearing, the monosyllable word recognition scores increased significantly from 9 per cent pre-operatively to 42 per cent post-operatively. Children with residual hearing tended to perform better on speech-related test material compared to children without prior auditory experience. Cochlear implantation is indicated in adults and children with residual hearing and minor benefit from conventional amplification. The contralateral ear in children should be considered for additional acoustical stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9888194     DOI: 10.3109/00206099809072991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiology        ISSN: 0020-6091


  10 in total

1.  Do adults with cochlear implants rely on different acoustic cues for phoneme perception than adults with normal hearing?

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Joanna H Lowenstein; Eric Tarr; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; D Bradley Welling; Antoine J Shahin; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Electrical excitation of the acoustically sensitive auditory nerve: single-fiber responses to electric pulse trains.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Kirill V Nourski; Fawen Zhang; Fuh-Cherng Jeng
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-16

3.  Auditory nerve fiber responses to combined acoustic and electric stimulation.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Kirill V Nourski; Fawen Zhang; Fuh-Cherng Jeng
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-02-10

4.  Predicting Speech Recognition Using the Speech Intelligibility Index and Other Variables for Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Sungmin Lee; Lisa Lucks Mendel; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 5.  Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.

Authors:  Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

6.  MUSIC APPRECIATION AND TRAINING FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS: A REVIEW.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2012-11-19

7.  Acoustic Cue Weighting by Adults with Cochlear Implants: A Mismatch Negativity Study.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Jyoti Bhat; Antoine J Shahin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Comparison of two cochlear implantation techniques and their effects on the preservation of residual hearing. Is the surgical approach of any importance?

Authors:  J T F Postelmans; R J Stokroos; E van Spronsen; W Grolman; R A Tange; M J Maré; Wouter Albert Dreschler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Pre-, per- and postoperative factors affecting performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: a new conceptual model over time.

Authors:  Diane S Lazard; Christophe Vincent; Frédéric Venail; Paul Van de Heyning; Eric Truy; Olivier Sterkers; Piotr H Skarzynski; Henryk Skarzynski; Karen Schauwers; Stephen O'Leary; Deborah Mawman; Bert Maat; Andrea Kleine-Punte; Alexander M Huber; Kevin Green; Paul J Govaerts; Bernard Fraysse; Richard Dowell; Norbert Dillier; Elaine Burke; Andy Beynon; François Bergeron; Deniz Başkent; Françoise Artières; Peter J Blamey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cochlear implantation in Bahrain: promising results.

Authors:  Ahmed J Jamal; A Rahman M Ghareeb; Omar Y Al-Sharif; Randah R Hamadeh
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.526

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.