Literature DB >> 988740

Choosing a substitute cardiac valve: type, size, surgeon.

W C Roberts.   

Abstract

Certain ideal characteristics of substitute cardiac valves are analyzed for each of the four basic types of available substitute cardiac valves. Of the four, the caged disc prosthesis is the least desirable: it obstructs, it clots and it degenerates. Each of the other three types of substitute cardiac valves has more favorable characteristics. Ideally, the caged ball prosthesis might be limited to patients with predominantly regurgitant lesions because of the problem of prosthetic disproportion. The tilting disc has favorable hemodynamic and wear characteristics, but long-term anticoagulant therapy is essential, as with the caged ball and caged disc types of prosthesis. The porcine xenograft appears to be desirable, but patients with sufficient implantation time (more than 5 years) for proper evaluation are just beginning to be studied and, therefore, final judgment must be reserved. Assuming that valve replacement is to be carried out in a large medical center by a surgical team experienced in this procedure, the results of this operation today are dependent more on the type and size of substitute valve inserted than on the surgeon who inserts the valve. It is therefore important for the cardiologist to become more informed about the various types of prosthetic cardiac valves and to become a member of the team deciding which type and size of cardiac valve are most suitable for his (or her) patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 988740     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(76)80014-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

1.  Assessment of prosthetic aortic valve performance by magnetic resonance velocity imaging.

Authors:  R Botnar; E Nagel; M B Scheidegger; E M Pedersen; O Hess; P Boesiger
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  In vitro velocity measurements in the near vicinity of the Bjork-Shiley aortic prosthesis using a laser-Doppler anemometer.

Authors:  A P Yoganathan; W H Corcoran; E C Harrison; J R Carl
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Twenty-two years without anticoagulation with metallic heart valve.

Authors:  Ali Yildiz; Firat Ozcan; Mehmet Dogan; Mehmet Fatih Ozlü; Ali Sasmaz
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  William Clifford Roberts, MD: an interview by W. Bruce Fye, MD.

Authors:  William C Roberts; W Bruce Fye
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2007-07

5.  INR self-management following mechanical heart valve replacement.

Authors:  H Koertke; K Minami; A Bairaktaris; O Wagner; R Koerfer
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  [INR Self-management after mechanical heart valve replacement: ESCAT (Early Self-Controlled Anticoagulation Trial)].

Authors:  H Körtke; K Minami; T Breymann; D Seifert; A Baraktaris; O Wagner; G Kleikamp; A El-Banayosy; N Mirow; R Körfer
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2001-12

7.  Clinical and haemodynamic evaluation of mounted porcine heterograft in mitral position.

Authors:  L Cotter; H C Miller
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1979-04

8.  In vitro velocity measurements down stream from the Ionescu-Shiley aortic bioprosthesis in steady and pulsatile flow.

Authors:  D D Hanle; E C Harrison; A P Yoganathan; W H Corcoran
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Calcification of glutaraldehyde-fixed porcine xenograft.

Authors:  A G Rose; R Forman; R M Bowen
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 9.139

10.  Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft valve: Hemodynamic evaluation and early clinical follow-up of 326 patients.

Authors:  David A. Ott; Aldemire T. Coelho; Denton A. Cooley; George J. Reul
Journal:  Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1980-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.