Literature DB >> 9885431

The influence of the impression tray on the accuracy of impressions for crown and bridge work--an investigation and review.

P V Carrotte1, A Johnson, R B Winstanley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of working casts for crown and bridge restorations made from twin mix putty/wash silicone elastomeric impression materials using different types of stock tray.
DESIGN: A master cast was made from ivorine teeth in a mandibular model. Three teeth were prepared for full crown restorations to simulate a single unit and a three unit bridge. Impressions were taken using four different types of impression tray and two different viscosities of silicone putty, together with a wash. Full metal crowns were constructed and seated on duplicate master casts and measurements made of the marginal discrepancies.
SETTING: The work was carried out in a dental technology laboratory in a university department of restorative dentistry in 1995/1996.
RESULTS: Metal and rigid plastic impression trays showed the least discrepancy (about 50 microns), the latter slightly greater with the normal putty than the soft one. Impressions taken with flexible plastic trays produced considerable discrepancy with both putties, approximately 210 microns and 180 microns respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Metal and rigid plastic stock trays give greater accuracy in the putty/wash silicone twin mix impression technique compared with flexible plastic ones for crown and bridge work. Those using the latter should be aware of their shortcoming in this respect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9885431     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  11 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions.

Authors:  Cristina Zarauz; Arelhys Valverde; Francisco Martinez-Rus; Bassam Hassan; Guillermo Pradies
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparative evaluation of dimensional accuracy of different polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques-in vitro study.

Authors:  Ramandeep Dugal; Bhargavi Railkar; Smita Musani
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-10-26

3.  In vivo Study of the Accuracy of Dual-arch Impressions.

Authors:  Luciana Martinelli Santayana de Lima; Gilberto Antonio Borges; Luiz Henrique Burnett Junior; Ana Maria Spohr
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-06-26

4.  A Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of the Dies Affected by Tray Type, Material Viscosity, and Pouring Sequence of Dual and Single Arch Impressions- An In vitro Study.

Authors:  Poonam R Kulkarni; Rahul S Kulkarni; Rupal J Shah; Rahul Chhajlani; Bhuwan Saklecha; Kavita Maru
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-04-01

5.  Multifunctional Templates for Minimized Osteotomy, Implantation, and Palatal Distraction with a Mini-Screw-Assisted Expander in Schizodontism and Maxillary Deficit.

Authors:  Manfred Nilius; Katrin Hess; Dominik Haim; Bernhard Weiland; Guenter Lauer
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2020-09-09

6.  Alternative impression technique for multiple abutments in difficult case to control.

Authors:  Bock-Young Jung; Keun-Woo Lee
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  Need for a reliable alternative to custom-made Implant Impression trays: An in vitro study comparing accuracy of custom trays versus specialized aluminum stock tray.

Authors:  Mukti Goel; Pankaj Dhawan; Piyush Tandan; Pankaj Madhukar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

8.  Impression Making and Lab Work Authorization Forms in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Preclinical Exercise.

Authors:  Tarek El-Kerdani; Arthur Nimmo
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2016-11-09

9.  Disposable plastic trays and their effect on polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impression accuracy-an in vitro study.

Authors:  Stefan Rues; Thomas Stober; Thomas Bargum; Peter Rammelsberg; Andreas Zenthöfer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Evaluation of the quality of fixed prosthesis impressions in private laboratories in a sample from Yemen.

Authors:  Nusaiba M Al-Odinee; Mohsen Al-Hamzi; Ibrahim Z Al-Shami; Ahmed Madfa; Abdulwahab I Al-Kholani; Yazeed M Al-Olofi
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.