Literature DB >> 9881946

Craniofacial resection for malignant neoplasms of the skull base: an overview.

J O Boyle1, K C Shah, J P Shah.   

Abstract

Advances in combined transcranial and transfacial (craniofacial) approaches for malignant tumors involving the anterior skull base have demonstrated improved survival. The technique allows adequate assessment of the intracranial extent of the tumor through an appropriate craniotomy. Vital structures, such as the dura, brain, and blood vessels, can be protected or resected and reconstructed safely. An en bloc excision can be accomplished. Dural defects and/or tears are satisfactorily repaired under direct vision, ensuring a watertight closure. Finally, adequate closure of the soft tissue defect is obtained, thus segregating the cranial cavity from the potentially infected nasal cavity and the nasopharynx with a resultant decrease in morbidity. Operative mortality is low, although complication rates are high. The technique is safe and continues to be improved to reduce morbidity. To evaluate the true impact of this surgical procedure on improvement in survival as well as quality of life, a multiinstitutional registry with uniform indications is indicated. With increasing experience and well-defined indications, improvement in survival (from 50% to 60%) and reduction in morbidity (from 30% to 40%) can be demonstrated through multiinstitutional, cooperative efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9881946     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199812)69:4<275::aid-jso13>3.0.co;2-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  10 in total

1.  Quantification of the advantages of the extended frontal approach to skull base.

Authors:  Rajesh Acharya; Mark Shaya; Ravi Kumar; Gloria C Caldito; Anil Nanda
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2004-08

2.  Combined craniofacial resection of anterior skull base tumors: long-term results and experience of single institution.

Authors:  Bashar Abuzayed; Bulent Canbaz; Galip Zihni Sanus; Seckin Aydin; Harun Cansiz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  Skull Base Reconstruction in the Pediatric Patient.

Authors:  Irit Duek; Alon Pener-Tessler; Ravit Yanko-Arzi; Arik Zaretski; Avraham Abergel; Ahmad Safadi; Dan M Fliss
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-01-05

4.  Quality of life following endonasal skull base surgery.

Authors:  Harshita Pant; Amol M Bhatki; Carl H Snyderman; Allan D Vescan; Ricardo L Carrau; Paul Gardner; Daniel Prevedello; Amin B Kassam
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2010-01

5.  Anterior Skull Base Defects Reconstructed Using Three-Layer Method: 78 Consecutive Cases with Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Murat Geyik; Ibrahim Erkutlu; Mehmet Alptekin; Inan Gezgin; Ayse Mizrak; Mehmet Dokur; Abdulvahap Gok
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-05-27

6.  Anterior cranial base reconstruction with a reverse temporalis muscle flap and calvarial bone graft.

Authors:  Seung Gee Kwon; Yong Oock Kim; Dong Kyun Rah
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2012-07-13

7.  Split calvarial graft to repair the large frontal bone defect.

Authors:  Amit Agrawal; Nitish Baisakhiya; Nitin Bhola
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2010-09-22

8.  Quality of Life following Surgery for Malignancies of the Anterior Skull Base.

Authors:  Chris Woertgen; Ralf Dirk Rothoerl; Werner Hosemann; Jürgen Strutz
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2007-03

9.  Low complication rates of cranial and craniofacial approaches to midline anterior skull base lesions.

Authors:  James T Kryzanski; Donald J Annino; Harsha Gopal; Carl B Heilman
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2008-07

10.  A comprehensive algorithm for anterior skull base reconstruction after oncological resections.

Authors:  Ziv Gil; Avraham Abergel; Leonor Leider-Trejo; Avi Khafif; Nevo Margalit; Aharon Amir; Eyal Gur; Dan M Fliss
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2007-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.