Literature DB >> 19119338

Low complication rates of cranial and craniofacial approaches to midline anterior skull base lesions.

James T Kryzanski1, Donald J Annino, Harsha Gopal, Carl B Heilman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Surgery is a cornerstone of treatment for a wide variety of neoplastic, congenital, traumatic, and inflammatory lesions involving the midline anterior skull base and may result in a significant anterior skull base defect requiring reconstruction. This study is a retrospective analysis of the reconstruction techniques and complications seen in a series of 58 consecutive patients with midline anterior skull base pathology treated with craniotomy or a craniofacial approach. The complication rates in this series are compared with other retrospective series and specific techniques that may reduce complications are then discussed.
DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of 58 consecutive patients who had surgery for a midline anterior skull base lesion between January 1994 and July 2003. Data were collected regarding pathology, surgical approach, reconstruction technique, and complications.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients underwent surgery for a meningioma (50%). The remainder had frontoethmoidal cancer, mucoceles/invasive nasal polyps, encephalocele, esthesioneuroblastoma, anterior falx dermoid cyst with a nasal sinus tract, or invasive pituitary adenoma. In most patients, a low and narrow two-piece biorbitofrontal craniotomy was used. When possible, the dura was repaired before entering the nasal cavity. Thirteen patients experienced a complication (22%). There was one case of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak (2%), one case of meningitis (2%), two cases of bone flap infection (3%), and two cases of symptomatic pneumocephalus (3%). There were no deaths, no reoperations for CSF leak, and no patient had a new permanent neurologic deficit other than anosmia.
CONCLUSIONS: Transcranial approaches for midline anterior skull base lesions can be performed safely with a low incidence of postoperative CSF leak, meningitis, bone flap infection, and symptomatic pneumocephalus. Our results, particularly with regard to CSF leakage, compare favorably with other retrospective series.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior skull base; cerebrospinal fluid leak; complications; craniofacial approach; meningioma; skull base surgery

Year:  2008        PMID: 19119338      PMCID: PMC2467480          DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1003924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skull Base        ISSN: 1531-5010


  37 in total

1.  Combined craniofacial resection for malignant disease.

Authors:  G Westbury; J S Wilson; A Richardson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Complications of anterior craniofacial resection.

Authors:  F L Dias; G M Sá; J Kligerman; H F Lopes; J R Wance; F P Paiva; A Benévolo; E Q Freitas
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  Prognostic factors and outcome in craniofacial surgery for malignant cutaneous tumors involving the anterior skull base.

Authors:  F L Dias; G M Sá; J Kligerman; J Nogueira; M L Galvão; R A Lima
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1997-07

4.  Results and prognostic factors in skull base surgery.

Authors:  L R Dos Santos; C R Cernea; L G Brandao; M G Siqueira; E A Vellutini; O P Velazco; O L Cruz; J Morais-Besteiro; C A Freitas
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Tumors of the paranasal sinuses: a therapeutic challenge.

Authors:  A S Ketcham; J M Van Buren
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Three-layer reconstruction for large defects of the anterior skull base.

Authors:  Uttam K Sinha; Terence E Johnson; Dennis Crockett; Satish Vadapalli; Peter Gruen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Anterior skull base surgery for benign and malignant disease.

Authors:  V L Schramm; E N Myers; J C Maroon
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  The subcranial approach for fronto-orbital and anteroposterior skull-base tumors.

Authors:  J Raveh; K Laedrach; M Speiser; J Chen; T Vuillemin; R Seiler; U Ebeling; K Leibinger
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1993-04

9.  Combined craniofacial resection for locally advanced carcinoma of the head and neck II. Carcinoma of the paranasal sinuses.

Authors:  J J Terz; H F Young; W Lawrence
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Split-calvaria osteoplastic rotational flap for anterior fossa floor repair after tumor excision. Technical note.

Authors:  A B Kantrowitz; C Hall; F Moser; A Spallone; J G Feghali
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  9 in total

1.  Combined craniofacial resection of anterior skull base tumors: long-term results and experience of single institution.

Authors:  Bashar Abuzayed; Bulent Canbaz; Galip Zihni Sanus; Seckin Aydin; Harun Cansiz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Olfactory preservation during anterior interhemispheric approach for anterior skull base lesions: technical note.

Authors:  Fumihiro Matano; Yasuo Murai; Takayuki Mizunari; Kojiro Tateyama; Shiro Kobayashi; Koji Adachi; Hiroyasu Kamiyama; Akio Morita; Akira Teramoto
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  Free-Flap Reconstruction of Skull Base and Orbital Defects.

Authors:  Weitao Wang; Aurora Vincent; Mofiyinfolu Sokoya; Scott Kohlert; Sameep Kadakia; Yadranko Ducic
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  A novel graft material for preventing cerebrospinal fluid leakage in skull base reconstruction: technical note of perifascial areolar tissue.

Authors:  Nakamasa Hayashi; Koichi Mitsuya; Katsuya Gorai; Keita Inoue; Ichiro Ito; Masahiro Nakagawa; Yoko Nakasu
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2014-08-11

5.  Anterior Skull Base Defects Reconstructed Using Three-Layer Method: 78 Consecutive Cases with Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Murat Geyik; Ibrahim Erkutlu; Mehmet Alptekin; Inan Gezgin; Ayse Mizrak; Mehmet Dokur; Abdulvahap Gok
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-05-27

Review 6.  Complications of Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Mofiyinfolu Sokoya; Moustafa Mourad; Yadranko Ducic
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.314

7.  Reoperation as a result of raised intracranial pressure associated with cyst formation in tumor cavity after intracranial tumor resection: a report of two cases.

Authors:  Jinlu Yu; Wenji Xiong; Limei Qu; Haiyan Huang
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2010-09-28

8.  New dried human amniotic membrane is useful as a substitute for dural repair after skull base surgery.

Authors:  Takahiro Tomita; Nakamasa Hayashi; Motonori Okabe; Toshiko Yoshida; Hideo Hamada; Shunro Endo; Toshio Nikaido
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2012-10

9.  A practical and economical method for frontal sinus reconstruction after frontal craniotomy: A single-center experience with 140 patients.

Authors:  Youwei Guo; Xianyong Fu; Wen Yin; Zhipeng Jiang; Yirui Kuang; Zhaoping Wu; Yudong Cao; Jun Tan; Xing-Jun Jiang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-07-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.