Literature DB >> 9881145

Determinants of contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in Great Britain and Germany. I: Demographic factors.

B J Oddens1, P Lehert.   

Abstract

Multifactorial analyses of data from representative British and German national contraception surveys were used to examine the principal demographic determinants of contraceptive use by women. Contraceptive use appeared to be determined mainly by reference to 'reproductive status' (the combined impact of age, marital status, parity and future child wish). Women who were postponing pregnancies were using oral contraceptives, whereas those who wanted no more children relied more on intrauterine devices or sterilisation. Differences between the countries suggested that the choice of contraceptive method was influenced by health care policy, the organisation of the relevant services and differential provider preferences. The contraceptive method used was also related to having occasional rather than steady sexual partners (more condom use), lower educational level (less oral contraceptive use) and frequent church attendance (greater use of condoms and periodic abstinence). Contraception decisions appeared to follow a fixed pattern, based more on a couple's demographic situation (reproductive status, country, educational level and religious beliefs) than on the characteristics of the contraceptive methods. This resulted in an unnecessarily restricted choice of methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparative Studies; Contraception; Contraceptive Usage--determinants; Correlation Studies; Data Analysis; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Europe; Factor Analysis; Family Planning; Germany; Northern Europe; Population; Research Methodology; Research Report; Statistical Studies; Studies; United Kingdom; Western Europe

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9881145     DOI: 10.1017/s002193209700415x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biosoc Sci        ISSN: 0021-9320


  8 in total

1.  Health care providers: a missing link in understanding acceptability of the female condom.

Authors:  Joanne E Mantell; Brooke S West; Kimberly Sue; Susie Hoffman; Theresa M Exner; Elizabeth Kelvin; Zena A Stein
Journal:  AIDS Educ Prev       Date:  2011-02

2.  Intrauterine device use and the risk of pre-eclampsia: a case-control study.

Authors:  S E Parker; S S Jick; M M Werler
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  Effect of village midwife program on contraceptive prevalence and method choice in Indonesia.

Authors:  Emily H Weaver; Elizabeth Frankenberg; Bruce J Fried; Duncan Thomas; Stephanie B Wheeler; John E Paul
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2013-12

4.  The perplexing links between contraceptive sterilization and (dis)advantage in ten low-fertility countries.

Authors:  Mieke C W Eeckhaut; Megan M Sweeney
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2016-01-21

5.  Risk perception and condom-use among Thai youths: findings from Kanchanaburi Demographic Surveillance System site in Thailand.

Authors:  Mohammad Raisul Haque; Amara Soonthorndhada
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Women's attitudes towards mechanisms of action of family planning methods: survey in primary health centres in Pamplona, Spain.

Authors:  Jokin de Irala; Cristina Lopez del Burgo; Carmen M Lopez de Fez; Jorge Arredondo; Rafael T Mikolajczyk; Joseph B Stanford
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 7.  Human papillomavirus infection and use of oral contraceptives.

Authors:  J Green; A Berrington de Gonzalez; J S Smith; S Franceschi; P Appleby; M Plummer; V Beral
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-06-02       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Factors that influence contraceptive use amongst women in Vanga health district, Democratic Republic of Congo.

Authors:  Kangale Izale; Indiran Govender; Jean-Pierre L Fina; John Tumbo
Journal:  Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med       Date:  2014-05-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.