Literature DB >> 9879773

c-erbB-2 oncoprotein, CEA, and CA 15.3 in patients with breast cancer: prognostic value.

R Molina1, J Jo, X Filella, G Zanon, J Pahisa, M Mu noz, B Farrus, M L Latre, C Escriche, J Estape, A M Ballesta.   

Abstract

The diagnostic value of a new tumor marker, c-erbB-2, was studied in the sera of 50 healthy subjects, 58 patients with benign breast diseases, and 413 patients with breast cancer (186 locoregional, 185 with advanced disease, and 42 with no evidence of disease). Using 15 U/ml as the cut-off, no healthy subjects or patients with benign diseases and only 2.4% of no evidence of disease patients had elevated serum levels. Abnormal c-erbB-2 levels were found in 29% (101/370) of the patients with breast carcinoma (locoregional 9%, metastases 45.4%). CEA (cut-off 5 U/ml) and CA 15.3 (cut-off 35 U/ml) sensitivity was 18% and 16% in patients with locoregional disease and 61% and 70% in those patients with advanced disease, respectively. A trend toward higher serum levels of all three tumor markers in patients with nodal involvement or greater tumor size was found, but was statistically significant only with CEA (p < 0.01). By contrast, c-erbB-2 was related to steroid receptors, in both locoregional and metastatic tumors. When the prognostic value of these markers was evaluated, patients with abnormally high presurgical CEA and c-erbB-2 had a worse prognosis than those patients with normal values, in both node-negative (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively) and node-positive patients (p < 0.556 and p < 0.001, respectively). By contrast, no relationship was found between CA 15.3 values and prognosis. Multivariate analysis showed that CEA and c-erbB-2 were also prognostic factors. The correlation between serum and tissue levels of c-erbB-2 was studied in the tumors of 161 patients. Significantly higher c-erbB-2 serum levels were found in patients with overexpression in tissue by immunohistochemistry, in both locoregional and advanced disease (p = 0.0001). Serum concentrations in patients with advanced disease were related to the site of recurrence, with significantly higher values in patients with metastases (mainly in those with liver metastases) than in those with locoregional recurrence. In summary, c-erbB-2 serum levels seem to be a useful tumor marker in the prognosis of patients with breast cancer. Using all three tumor markers, sensitivity was 35% in patients with locoregional breast cancer and 88% in patients with recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9879773     DOI: 10.1023/a:1005734429304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  22 in total

1.  Evaluation of tumor markers (HER-2/neu oncoprotein, CEA, and CA 15.3) in patients with locoregional breast cancer: prognostic value.

Authors:  Rafael Molina; Jose M Augé; Jose M Escudero; Xavier Filella; Gabriel Zanon; Jaume Pahisa; Blanca Farrus; Montserrat Muñoz; Martin Velasco
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2010-04-02

2.  Tumor marker usage and medical care costs among older early-stage breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Scott D Ramsey; N Lynn Henry; Julie R Gralow; Dana K Mirick; William Barlow; Ruth Etzioni; David Mummy; Rahber Thariani; David L Veenstra
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Kinetics of CEA and CA15-3 correlate with treatment response in patients undergoing chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Authors:  Dorit Di Gioia; Volker Heinemann; Dorothea Nagel; Michael Untch; Steffen Kahlert; Ingo Bauerfeind; Thomas Koehnke; Petra Stieber
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2011-05-08

4.  The application of CdTe/CdS in the detection of carcinoembryonic antigen by fluorescence polarization immunoassay.

Authors:  Jianniao Tian; Liujin Zhou; Yanchun Zhao; Yuan Wang; Yan Peng; Xue Hong; Shulin Zhao
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Association of CA 15-3 and CEA with clinicopathological parameters in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Biao Geng; Man-Man Liang; Xiao-Bing Ye; Wen-Ying Zhao
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-18

6.  A new marker for breast cancer diagnosis, human epididymis protein 4: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Umut Riza Gündüz; Meral Gunaldi; Nilgun Isiksacan; Seyda Gündüz; Yildiz Okuturlar; Hakan Kocoglu
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-03

7.  Is a comparative clinical trial for breast cancer tumor markers to monitor disease recurrence warranted? A value of information analysis.

Authors:  Rahber Thariani; Norah Lynn Henry; Scott D Ramsey; David K Blough; Bill Barlow; Julie R Gralow; David L Veenstra
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.744

8.  Serum profiling using protein microarrays to identify disease related antigens.

Authors:  Donald Sharon; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2014

9.  Clinical usefulness of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 extracellular domain as a biomarker for monitoring cancer status and predicting the therapeutic efficacy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Keiichi Kontani; Noriyuki Kuroda; Shin-ichiro Hashimoto; Chisa Murazawa; Shoko Norimura; Hiroaki Tanaka; Masahiro Ohtani; Naomi Fujiwara-Honjo; Yoshio Kushida; Manabu Date; Reiji Haba; Hitoshi Houchi; Akira Yamauchi; Hiroyasu Yokomise
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 4.742

10.  The multiplex bead array approach to identifying serum biomarkers associated with breast cancer.

Authors:  Byoung Kwon Kim; Jong Won Lee; Pil Je Park; Yong Sung Shin; Won Young Lee; Kyung Ae Lee; Sena Ye; Heesun Hyun; Kyung Nam Kang; Donghwa Yeo; Youngdai Kim; Sung Yup Ohn; Dong Young Noh; Chul Woo Kim
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.