Literature DB >> 9879642

DNA/protein flow cytometry as a predictive marker of malignancy in dysplasia-free Barrett's esophagus: thirteen-year follow-up study on a cohort of patients.

L Teodori1, W Göhde, M Persiani, F Ferrario, D Tirindelli Danesi, C Scarpignato, U Di Tondo, P Alò, L Capurso.   

Abstract

Intestinal metaplasia identifies Barrett's esophagus (BE) and is associated with an increased risk for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Dysplasia occurs as an intermediate step. However, progression from metaplasia to neoplasia without the demonstration of dysplasia has been described. The role of dual-parameter flow cytometry (FC) as a predictor of neoplastic risk in dysplasia-free cases was evaluated. DNA/protein FC and histology were performed on 362 samples from 30 dysplasia-free BE patients, followed up since 1985 once every 1-2 years. Nine cases were aneuploid, five of which (group IV) were frankly aneuploid; in the other four cases (group III), aneuploidy was detectable by dual-parameter analysis only. Twenty-one patients were diploid. Twelve (group II) also had an abnormally high G1-phase protein content compared to group I (nine patients), which were diploid with a low-moderate protein content. In three patients of group IV an adenocarcinoma in situ was diagnosed, after 5, 6, and 10 years, respectively. In two patients of group III, a low- and a high-grade dysplasia were observed at 3 and 6 years follow-up, respectively. One patient of group I first acquired a high protein content, then an aneuploid DNA content, and then progressed to adenocarcinoma (12 years). None of the still diploid patients (17 cases) have progressed to dysplasia or cancer compared with 6 of 13 presently aneuploid patients (P < 0.01). In conclusion, DNA/protein FC is a marker of increased malignant potential and thus may be used to detect patients at higher risk in dysplasia-free BE and assist in understanding the various stages of malignant transformation in long-term follow-up studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9879642     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0320(19981215)34:6<257::aid-cyto3>3.0.co;2-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry        ISSN: 0196-4763


  26 in total

Review 1.  Molecular biology of Barrett's adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  B P Wijnhoven; H W Tilanus; W N Dinjens
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Early events during neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Brian J Reid
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 3.  Magnitude of Missed Esophageal Adenocarcinoma After Barrett's Esophagus Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kavel Visrodia; Siddharth Singh; Rajesh Krishnamoorthi; David A Ahlquist; Kenneth K Wang; Prasad G Iyer; David A Katzka
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 4.  Open questions in oesophageal adenocarcinogenesis.

Authors:  Carlo C Maley
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Barrett's oesophagus: from metaplasia to dysplasia and cancer.

Authors:  J-F Fléjou
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Genetic Insights in Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Brian J Reid; Thomas G Paulson; Xiaohong Li
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 7.  Low grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: Should we worry?

Authors:  Vamshi P Jagadesham; Clive J Kelty
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2014-05-15

8.  Predictors of progression in Barrett's esophagus II: baseline 17p (p53) loss of heterozygosity identifies a patient subset at increased risk for neoplastic progression.

Authors:  B J Reid; L J Prevo; P C Galipeau; C A Sanchez; G Longton; D S Levine; P L Blount; P S Rabinovitch
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Surrogate Markers: Lessons from the Next Gen?

Authors:  Brian J Reid
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2016-05-02

10.  Translation of an STR-based biomarker into a clinically compatible SNP-based platform for loss of heterozygosity.

Authors:  Heather D Kissel; Patricia C Galipeau; Xiaohong Li; Brian J Reid
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.