Literature DB >> 16899004

Are physician reimbursement strategies associated with processes of care and patient satisfaction for patients with diabetes in managed care?

Susan L Ettner1, Theodore J Thompson, Mark R Stevens, Carol M Mangione, Catherine Kim, W Neil Steers, Jennifer Goewey, Arleen F Brown, Richard S Chung, K M Venkat Narayan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between physician reimbursement incentives and diabetes care processes and explore potential confounding with physician organizational model. DATA SOURCES: Primary data collected during 2000-2001 in 10 managed care plans. STUDY
DESIGN: Multilevel logistic regressions were used to estimate associations between reimbursement incentives and process measures, including the receipt of dilated eye exams, foot exams, influenza immunizations, advice to take aspirin, and assessments of glycemic control, proteinuria, and lipid profile. Reimbursement measures included the proportions of compensation received from salary, capitation, fee-for-service (FFS), and performance-based payment; the performance-based payment criteria used; and interactions of these criteria with the strength of the performance-based payment incentive. DATA COLLECTION: Patient, provider group, and health plan surveys and medical record reviews were conducted for 6,194 patients with diabetes. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Without controlling for physician organizational model, care processes were better when physician compensation was based primarily on direct salary rather than FFS reimbursement (four of seven processes were better, with relative risks ranging from 1.13 to 1.23) or capitation (six were better, with relative risks from 1.06 to 1.36); and when quality/satisfaction scores influenced physician compensation (three were better, with relative risks from 1.17 to 1.26). However, these associations were substantially confounded by organizational model.
CONCLUSIONS: Physician reimbursement strategies are associated with diabetes care processes, although their independent contributions are difficult to assess, due to high correlation with physician organizational model. Regardless of causality, a group's use of quality/satisfaction scores to determine physician compensation may indicate delivery of high-quality diabetes care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16899004      PMCID: PMC1797087          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00533.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  38 in total

1.  Financial incentives for childhood immunization.

Authors:  D Hemenway
Journal:  J Policy Anal Manage       Date:  1995

2.  Incentive-based physician compensation models.

Authors:  K P Glass; L E Pieper; M F Berlin
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  1999-07

3.  Addressing physician compensation and practice productivity.

Authors:  J T Tufano; D A Conrad; S Y Liang
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  1999-07

Review 4.  The utility of decision support, clinical guidelines, and financial incentives as tools to achieve improved clinical performance.

Authors:  S Goldfarb
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  1999-03

5.  Confirmatory factor analysis of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) 1.0 Core Survey.

Authors:  G N Marshall; L S Morales; M Elliott; K Spritzer; R D Hays
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2001-06

6.  Theory and practice in the design of physician payment incentives.

Authors:  J C Robinson
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.911

7.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

Review 8.  The effect of explicit financial incentives on physician behavior.

Authors:  B S Armour; M M Pitts; R Maclean; C Cangialose; M Kishel; H Imai; J Etchason
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-05-28

9.  Measuring the effects of managed care on physicians' perceptions of their personal financial incentives.

Authors:  J M Mitchell; J Hadley; D P Sulmasy; J G Bloche
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.730

10.  Disclosing physician financial incentives.

Authors:  T E Miller; W M Sage
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  10 in total

1.  Correlates of depression among people with diabetes: The Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study.

Authors:  Beth Waitzfelder; Robert B Gerzoff; Andrew J Karter; Stephen Crystal; Mathew J Bair; Susan L Ettner; Arleen F Brown; Usha Subramanian; Shou-En Lu; David Marrero; William H Herman; Joseph V Selby; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  Prim Care Diabetes       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Quality of breast cancer care: perception versus practice.

Authors:  Nina A Bickell; Jennifer Neuman; Kezhen Fei; Rebeca Franco; Kathie-Ann Joseph
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Physician perception of reimbursement for outpatient procedures among managed care patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Catherine Kim; Edward F Tierney; William H Herman; Carol M Mangione; K M Venkat Narayan; Robert B Gerzoff; Dori Bilik; Susan L Ettner
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 4.  Health systems, patients factors, and quality of care for diabetes: a synthesis of findings from the TRIAD study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 17.152

5.  A comparison of chronic illness care quality in US and UK family medicine practices prior to pay-for-performance initiatives.

Authors:  Jesse C Crosson; Pamela A Ohman-Strickland; Stephen Campbell; Robert L Phillips; Martin O Roland; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Andrew Bazemore; Bijal Balasubramanian; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 2.267

6.  Comparison of primary care models in the prevention of cardiovascular disease - a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Clare Liddy; Jatinderpreet Singh; William Hogg; Simone Dahrouge; Monica Taljaard
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Physician compensation from salary and quality of diabetes care.

Authors:  Catherine Kim; W Neil Steers; William H Herman; Carol M Mangione; K M Venkat Narayan; Susan L Ettner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Effect of Paying for Performance on Utilisation, Quality, and User Costs of Health Services in Tanzania: A Controlled Before and After Study.

Authors:  Peter Binyaruka; Edith Patouillard; Timothy Powell-Jackson; Giulia Greco; Ottar Maestad; Josephine Borghi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Behavior change interventions and policies influencing primary healthcare professionals' practice-an overview of reviews.

Authors:  Bhupendrasinh F Chauhan; Maya M Jeyaraman; Amrinder Singh Mann; Justin Lys; Becky Skidmore; Kathryn M Sibley; Ahmed M Abou-Setta; Ryan Zarychanski
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Type 2 Diabetes: Why We Are Winning the Battle but Losing the War? 2015 Kelly West Award Lecture.

Authors:  K M Venkat Narayan
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 19.112

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.