Literature DB >> 9878937

A randomized, multicenter trial of weight-adjusted intravenous heparin dose titration and point-of-care coagulation monitoring in hospitalized patients with active thromboembolic disease. Antithrombotic Therapy Consortium Investigators.

R C Becker1, S P Ball, P Eisenberg, S Borzak, A C Held, F Spencer, S J Voyce, R Jesse, R Hendel, Y Ma, T Hurley, J Hebert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Therapy with intravenous unfractionated heparin improves clinical outcome in patients with active thromboembolic disease, but achieving and maintaining a therapeutic level of anticoagulation remains a major challenge for clinicians.
METHODS: A total of 113 patients requiring heparin for at least 48 hours were randomly assigned at 7 medical centers to either weight-adjusted or non-weight-adjusted dose titration. They were separately assigned to either laboratory-based or point-of-care (bedside) coagulation monitoring.
RESULTS: Weight-adjusted heparin dosing yielded a higher mean activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) value 6 hours after treatment initiation than non-weight-adjusted dosing (99.9 vs 78.8 seconds; P =.002) and reduced the time required to exceed a minimum threshold (aPTT >45 seconds) of anticoagulation (10.5 vs 8.6 hours; P =.002). Point-of-care coagulation monitoring significantly reduced the time from blood sample acquisition to a heparin infusion adjustment (0.4 vs 1.6 hours; P <.0001) and to reach the therapeutic aPTT range (51 to 80 seconds) (16.1 vs 19.4 hours; P =.24) compared with laboratory monitoring. Although a majority of patients participating in the study surpassed the minimum threshold of anticoagulation within the first 12 hours and reached the target aPTT within 24 hours, maintaining the aPTT within the therapeutic range was relatively uncommon (on average 30% of the overall study period) and did not differ between treatment or monitoring strategies.
CONCLUSIONS: Weight-adjusted heparin dosing according to a standardized titration nomogram combined with point-of-care coagulation monitoring using the BMC Coaguchek Plus System represents an effective and widely generalizable strategy for managing patients with thromboembolic disease that fosters the rapid achievement of a desired range of anticoagulation. Additional work is needed, however, to improve on existing patient-specific strategies that can more effectively sustain a therapeutic state of anticoagulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9878937     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70460-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  9 in total

Review 1.  The role of point-of-care anticoagulation monitoring in arterial and venous thromboembolic disorders.

Authors:  C R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Evaluation of 2 weight-based protocols for administration of heparin.

Authors:  Diana Tsang; Karen F Shalansky; Elaine Lum
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2009-11

3.  Heparin resistance in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Jonathan D Rich; John M Maraganore; Edward Young; Rosa-Maria Lidon; Burt Adelman; Paul Bourdon; Supoat Charenkavanich; Jack Hirsh; Pierre Theroux; Christopher P Cannon
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Anne Holbrook; Sam Schulman; Daniel M Witt; Per Olav Vandvik; Jason Fish; Michael J Kovacs; Peter J Svensson; David L Veenstra; Mark Crowther; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Low molecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin in the early pharmacologic management of acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  M T Le Nguyen; F A Spencer
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 6.  Low-molecular-weight heparin should replace unfractionated heparin in the management of acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  P J Zed
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 7.  Low molecular weight heparins and coronary artery disease.

Authors:  P J Zed
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Systematic review of interventions to improve safety and quality of anticoagulant prescribing for therapeutic indications for hospital inpatients.

Authors:  Andrew Frazer; James Rowland; Alison Mudge; Michael Barras; Jennifer Martin; Peter Donovan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  An automated strategy for bedside aPTT determination and unfractionated heparin infusion adjustment in acute coronary syndromes: insights from PARAGON A.

Authors:  L Kristin Newby; Robert A Harrington; Manjushri V Bhapkar; Frans Van de Werf; Judith S Hochman; Christopher B Granger; R John Simes; Catherine G Davis; Eric J Topol; Robert M Califf; David J Moliterno
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.300

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.