BACKGROUND:Intravenous unfractionated heparin remains a cornerstone of anticoagulation therapy for patients with acute coronary syndromes, but regulation to a target aPTT is challenging. We assessed unfractionated heparin infusion regulation by bedside, whole-blood aPTT testing and computerized, algorithmic infusion adjustment, and further evaluated the relationship of achieving the target aPTT with clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 1,275 patients randomized tounfractionated heparin in PARAGON-A, which tested lamifiban with or without unfractionated heparin versus unfractionated heparin. All patients had baseline and 6-hour blinded, bedside aPTTs, then aPTTs per algorithm. A central computer translated encrypted values to algorithmic dose-adjustment commands. We assessed the ability to achieve and maintain aPTTs of 50-70 seconds and associations of 6- and 12-hour aPTTs and time-to-target with 30-day outcomes.Overall, the median 6-hour aPTT was 50-70 seconds and remained so throughout infusion. Individually, only 33.6% of patients achieved 6-hour target-range aPTTs, and only 40% of all aPTTs were in-range. After achieving target, only 42% of subsequent measures were in-range. Thirty-day death or myocardial infarction (death/MI) increased non-significantly as time-to-target increased (p = 0.08). Thirty-day mortality was similar if target aPTT was reached, regardless of timing. Death/MI trended lower if target aPTT was reached by 8 hours (p = 0.10). The best clinical outcomes were associated with in-range aPTTs. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the most systematic monitoring and regulation of unfractionated heparin anticoagulation to date. Although average anticoagulation achieved target range, wide inter- and intra-patient variability may have important implications for clinical outcomes.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Intravenous unfractionated heparin remains a cornerstone of anticoagulation therapy for patients with acute coronary syndromes, but regulation to a target aPTT is challenging. We assessed unfractionated heparin infusion regulation by bedside, whole-blood aPTT testing and computerized, algorithmic infusion adjustment, and further evaluated the relationship of achieving the target aPTT with clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 1,275 patients randomized to unfractionated heparin in PARAGON-A, which tested lamifiban with or without unfractionated heparin versus unfractionated heparin. All patients had baseline and 6-hour blinded, bedside aPTTs, then aPTTs per algorithm. A central computer translated encrypted values to algorithmic dose-adjustment commands. We assessed the ability to achieve and maintain aPTTs of 50-70 seconds and associations of 6- and 12-hour aPTTs and time-to-target with 30-day outcomes.Overall, the median 6-hour aPTT was 50-70 seconds and remained so throughout infusion. Individually, only 33.6% of patients achieved 6-hour target-range aPTTs, and only 40% of all aPTTs were in-range. After achieving target, only 42% of subsequent measures were in-range. Thirty-day death or myocardial infarction (death/MI) increased non-significantly as time-to-target increased (p = 0.08). Thirty-day mortality was similar if target aPTT was reached, regardless of timing. Death/MI trended lower if target aPTT was reached by 8 hours (p = 0.10). The best clinical outcomes were associated with in-range aPTTs. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the most systematic monitoring and regulation of unfractionated heparin anticoagulation to date. Although average anticoagulation achieved target range, wide inter- and intra-patient variability may have important implications for clinical outcomes.
Authors: T J Ryan; E M Antman; N H Brooks; R M Califf; L D Hillis; L F Hiratzka; E Rapaport; B Riegel; R O Russell; E E Smith; W D Weaver; R J Gibbons; J S Alpert; K A Eagle; T J Gardner; A Garson; G Gregoratos; T J Ryan; S C Smith Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: R C Becker; S P Ball; P Eisenberg; S Borzak; A C Held; F Spencer; S J Voyce; R Jesse; R Hendel; Y Ma; T Hurley; J Hebert Journal: Am Heart J Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Eugene Braunwald; Elliott M Antman; John W Beasley; Robert M Califf; Melvin D Cheitlin; Judith S Hochman; Robert H Jones; Dean Kereiakes; Joel Kupersmith; Thomas N Levin; Carl J Pepine; John W Schaeffer; Earl E Smith; David E Steward; Pierre Theroux; Raymond J Gibbons; Joseph S Alpert; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Gabriel Gregoratos; Loren F Hiratzka; Alice K Jacobs; Sidney C Smith Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-10-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: C B Granger; J Hirsch; R M Califf; J Col; H D White; A Betriu; L H Woodlief; K L Lee; E G Bovill; R J Simes; E J Topol Journal: Circulation Date: 1996-03-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: R C Becker; C P Cannon; R P Tracy; B Thompson; E G Bovill; P Desvigne-Nickens; A M Randall; G Knatternud; E Braunwald Journal: Am Heart J Date: 1996-03 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: K M Zabel; C B Granger; R C Becker; E G Bovill; J Hirsh; P E Aylward; E J Topol; R M Califf Journal: Am Heart J Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Jonathan D Rich; John M Maraganore; Edward Young; Rosa-Maria Lidon; Burt Adelman; Paul Bourdon; Supoat Charenkavanich; Jack Hirsh; Pierre Theroux; Christopher P Cannon Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2007-01-13 Impact factor: 2.300