Literature DB >> 9876651

Inferolateral retraction reduces the risk of thermal injury to biliary structures.

C Linderman1, D Pratt, M Petricevic, S G ReMine.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Do various traction techniques significantly change the anatomic position during laparoscopic cholecystectomy?
METHODS: 16 cadaveric liver specimens were dissected and measurements were taken between structures in the triangle of Calot. Measurements were taken while traction was placed on the infidubilum in the inferolateral, cephalad and anatomic positions. Thermal necrosis data was measured one week post-injury in a rat model for Non-contact Yag laser, Quartz, Sapphire tip, and electrocautery.
RESULTS: Inferolateral traction provided statistically significant increases in distance (P < 0.01) between the critical biliary structures. The increase in length by cephalad traction on the gallbladder was not statistically significant. Depth of necrosis for the devices were: cautery 1.03 mm, sapphire tip 0.63 mm, non-contact Yag laser 2.13 mm, and bare quartz tip laser 1.05 mm.
CONCLUSION: Inferolateral traction produced a statistically significant increase in distance between the critical biliary structures. This was not demonstrated with cephalad traction. We recommend avoiding thermal dissection in the Triangle of Calot due to the thermal devices necrosis depth in relation to the proximity of the biliary structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9876651      PMCID: PMC3015228     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JSLS        ISSN: 1086-8089            Impact factor:   2.172


  9 in total

Review 1.  Complications of laparoscopy.

Authors:  H J Nord
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J L Ponsky
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  28,621 cholecystectomies in Ohio. Results of a survey in Ohio hospitals by the Gallbladder Survey Committee, Ohio Chapter, American College of Surgeons.

Authors:  D J Arnold
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases.

Authors:  D J Deziel; K W Millikan; S G Economou; A Doolas; S T Ko; M C Airan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The new 'gold standard'?

Authors:  N J Soper; P T Stockmann; D L Dunnegan; S W Ashley
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-08

6.  Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A M Davidoff; T N Pappas; E A Murray; D J Hilleren; R D Johnson; M E Baker; G E Newman; P B Cotton; W C Meyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  A retrospective analysis of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomies.

Authors:  B Cagir; M Rangraj; L Maffuci; L E Ostrander; B L Herz
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1994-04

8.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a community hospital: experience with 600 laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Authors:  G B Williams; R S Silverman
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1994-04

9.  Bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  C M Ferguson; D W Rattner; A L Warshaw
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1992-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.