Literature DB >> 9875082

Late complications following permanent pacemaker implantation or elective unit replacement.

A A Harcombe1, S A Newell, P F Ludman, T E Wistow, L D Sharples, P M Schofield, D L Stone, L M Shapiro, T Cole, M C Petch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of late complications following first implantation or elective unit replacement of a permanent pacemaker system.
DESIGN: Analysis of pacemaker data and complications prospectively acquired on a computerised database. Complications were studied over an 11 year period from January 1984 to December 1994.
SETTING: Tertiary referral cardiothoracic centre. PATIENTS: Records of 2621 patients were analysed retrospectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Complications requiring repeat procedures occurring more than six weeks after pacemaker implantation or elective unit replacement.
RESULTS: The overall rate of late complications was significantly lower after first implantation of a permanent pacemaker (34 cases, complication rate 1.4%, 95% confidence interval 0.9% to 1.9%) than after elective unit replacement (16 cases, complication rate 6.5% (3.3% to 9.7%). There were 20 cases of erosion, 18 infections, five electrode problems, and seven miscellaneous problems. Complications were more common with inexperienced operators (18.9% (6.0% to 31.8%)) than with experienced operators (0.9% (0.3% to 1.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of late complications following pacemaker implantation is low and compares favourably with early complication rates. The majority are caused by erosion and infection. Patients who have undergone elective unit replacement are at particular risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9875082      PMCID: PMC1761100          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.80.3.240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  13 in total

1.  Complications after single versus dual chamber pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  X Mueller; H Sadeghi; L Kappenberger
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Surgical removal of infected transvenous pacemaker leads.

Authors:  R Frame; R F Brodman; S Furman; C A Andrews; J N Gross
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Survey of cardiac pacing and defibrillation in the United States in 1993.

Authors:  A D Bernstein; V Parsonnet
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Complications of permanent transvenous cardiac pacing: a 14-year review of all transvenous pacemakers inserted at one community hospital.

Authors:  P E Hill
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 1.976

5.  Pacemaker-implantation complication rates: an analysis of some contributing factors.

Authors:  V Parsonnet; A D Bernstein; B Lindsay
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1989-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Antibiotic prophylaxis for pacemaker implantation: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  D R Ramsdale; R G Charles; D B Rowlands; S S Singh; P C Gautam; E B Faragher
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Permanent pacemaker infections: characterization and management.

Authors:  M H Choo; D R Holmes; B J Gersh; J D Maloney; J Merideth; J R Pluth; J Trusty
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in permanent pacemaker implantation: a prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  J P Mounsey; M J Griffith; M Tynan; F K Gould; A F MacDermott; R G Gold; R S Bexton
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-10

9.  Prophylactic antibiotics for cardiac pacemaker implantation. A prospective trail.

Authors:  M F Muers; A G Arnold; P Sleight
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1981-11

10.  Mechanical, but not infective, pacemaker erosion may be successfully managed by re-implantation of pacemakers.

Authors:  M J Griffith; J P Mounsey; R S Bexton; M P Holden
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-02
View more
  25 in total

1.  Local symptoms at the site of pacemaker implantation indicate latent systemic infection.

Authors:  D Klug; F Wallet; D Lacroix; C Marquié; C Kouakam; S Kacet; R Courcol
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Total extrusion of a normally functioning pacemaker.

Authors:  Serkan Yuksel; Serdar Demir; Mahmut Sahin
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2012

3.  Special problems of pacing in children.

Authors:  Herwig Antretter; Joshua Colvin; Ulli Schweigmann; Herbert Hangler; Daniel Hofer; Karin Dunst; Josef Margreiter; Guenther Laufer
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2003-01-01

Review 4.  [Upgrading to biventricular pacing: indications and procedural challenges].

Authors:  H-H Minden; C Butter
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-12

5.  Treatment of a malpositioned transcutaneous ventricular pacing lead in the left ventricle via direct aortic puncture.

Authors:  James N Irvine; Damien J LaPar; Srijoy Mahapatra; John P DiMarco; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 5.214

6.  Single- and dual-site ventricular pacing entirely through the coronary sinus for patients with prior tricuspid valve surgery.

Authors:  Chin C Lee; Khuyen Do; Sati Patel; Steven K Carlson; Tomas Konecny; Philip M Chang; Rahul N Doshi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  [Leadless pacemakers and subcutaneously implantable cardioverter defibrillators].

Authors:  C Stellbrink; B Hansky; D Meyer Zu Vilsendorf
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.743

8.  Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms by a novel antibacterial envelope for use with implantable cardiac devices.

Authors:  Alessandra Agostinho; Garth James; Oussama Wazni; Mark Citron; Bruce D Wilkoff
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.689

9.  Unusual chest pain syndromes caused by implanted cardiac device leads: a case series.

Authors:  Chance M Witt; Patricia J M Best; Samuel J Asirvatham; Christopher J McLeod
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  [Vacuum-assisted treatment of severe pacemaker pocket infection].

Authors:  Schroeter Thomas; Doll Nicolas; Piorkowski Christopher; Hilbert Sebastian; Mohr Friedrich Wilhelm
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2009-02-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.