Literature DB >> 9874058

Standardized guidelines for the interpretation of dobutamine echocardiography reduce interinstitutional variance in interpretation.

R Hoffmann1, H Lethen, T Marwick, R Rambaldi, P Fioretti, A Pingitore, E Picano, T Buck, R Erbel, F A Flachskampf, P Hanrath.   

Abstract

Subjective interpretation of dobutamine echocardiograms provides only moderate interinstitutional observer agreement if nonunified data acquisition and assessment criteria are applied. The present study was undertaken to evaluate parameters associated with low interinstitutional observer agreement in the interpretation of dobutamine echocardiograms and to analyze whether standardized interpretation criteria improve interinstitutional observer agreement. One hundred fifty dobutamine echocardiograms (dobutamine up to 40 microg/kg/min body weight and atropine up to 1 mg) were evaluated at 5 centers. Clinical, procedural, and echocardiographic parameters were included in the analysis of variables with significant impact on interinstitutional agreement. Standardized interpretative criteria were established, and 90 dobutamine echocardiograms were reanalyzed by 3 observers using a standardized image display. Multivariate analysis demonstrated low image quality (odds ratio [OR] 0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08 to 0.45, p=0.0002), low severity of induced wall motion abnormality (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.40, p <0.0001), and a low peak rate-pressure product (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.43 to 2.27, p=0.0382) to result in a low interinstitutional agreement. Standardization of image display in cine loop format and of dobutamine stress echo interpretation criteria resulted in improvement in test result categorization as normal or abnormal, with a kappa value of 0.50, compared with 0.39 using the original subjective interpretation. In conclusion, image quality, the severity of induced wall motion abnormalities, and the obtained rate-pressure product have a significant impact on the interpretation homogeneity of dobutamine echocardiograms. Standardization of image display in cine loop format and of reading criteria results in improved interinstitutional agreement in interpretation of stress echocardiograms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9874058     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00697-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

1.  Contrast agents provide a faster learning curve in dipyridamole stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Jose Zamorano; Violeta Sánchez; Raúl Moreno; Carlos Almería; Jose Rodrigo; Viviana Serra; Luis Azcona; Adalia Aubele; Luis Mataix; Luis Sánchez-Harguindey
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Between observer variation is not eliminated by standardised analysis of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Steen Carstensen; Henning Bundgaard; Lars Kjøller-Hansen; Dan Atar; Samir M Ali; Kari Saunamäki; Henning Kelbaek
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Noninvasive prediction of coronary artery disease progression by comparison of serial exercise electrocardiography and dipyridamole stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Olaf Rodriguez; Eugenio Picano; Silvio Fedele; Martha Morelos; Mario Marzilli
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Techniques for comprehensive two dimensional echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular systolic function.

Authors:  T H Marwick
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Implications of Abnormal Exercise Electrocardiography With Normal Stress Echocardiography.

Authors:  Melissa A Daubert; Joseph Sivak; Allison Dunning; Pamela S Douglas; Brian Coyne; Tracy Y Wang; Daniel B Mark; Eric J Velazquez
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Left ventricular torsion and circumferential strain responses to exercise in patients with ischemic coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Jesus Peteiro; Alberto Bouzas-Mosquera; Javier Broullon; Gabriel Sanchez-Fernandez; Cayetana Barbeito; Lucia Perez-Cebey; Dolores Martinez; Jose M Vazquez-Rodriguez
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Interhospital observer agreement in interpretation of exercise myocardial Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT studies.

Authors:  J Candell-Riera; C Santana-Boado; B Bermejo; L Armadans; J Castell; I Casáns; J Jurado; J Magriñá; J N de la Rosa
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  The value of core lab stress echocardiography interpretations: observations from the ISCHEMIA Trial.

Authors:  Akihisa Kataoka; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie; Roxy Senior; Gilbert Gosselin; Denis Phaneuf; Gabriela Guzman; Gian Perna; Alfonso Lara; Sasko Kedev; Andrea Mortara; Mohammad El-Hajjar; Leslee J Shaw; Harmony R Reynolds; Michael H Picard
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 2.062

Review 9.  Combination of contrast with stress echocardiography: a practical guide to methods and interpretation.

Authors:  Stuart Moir; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 2.062

10.  Two-dimensional speckle tracking for the assessment of coronary artery disease during dobutamine stress echo: clinical tool or merely research method.

Authors:  Constantina Aggeli; Stauroula Lagoudakou; Ioannis Felekos; Vasiliki Panagopoulou; Stellios Kastellanos; Konstantinos Toutouzas; George Roussakis; Dimitris Tousoulis
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 2.062

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.