BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the degree of interhospital agreement in the interpretation of exercise myocardial technetium-99m tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Five experienced hospital laboratories were asked to submit 2 sets of myocardial Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT images obtained in 150 patients undergoing coronary angiography: group A used a uniform color scale for all hospitals, and group B used the individual color scale in place at each hospital (uniform color scale, nonuniform color scale, and black-and-white scale). Thus a total of 300 images were interpreted by each center without knowledge of any other patient data. Angiographically significant coronary artery disease (< or =50% diameter stenosis) was present in 90 patients (60%). By a majority decision (3 or more centers), the sensitivity was found to be similar for groups A and B (82% and 84%, respectively), but the specificity was significantly higher for group A (87% vs 73%; P =.021). Four or all 5 of the centers agreed on abnormal or normal results of SPECT images in 87% of patients in group A (kappa 0.626) and in 78% of patients in group B (kappa 0.528). The kappa value of 0.617 was obtained for the uniform color scale, 0.467 for the uniform black-and-white scale, and 0.444 for the nonuniform color scale. Agreement on the left anterior descending artery territory (81% for group A and 78% for group B) was similar to that of the right coronary artery territory (79% for A and 75% for B) and to that of the left circumflex artery territory (91% for A and 85% for B). Agreement was similar in patients with 1-, 2-, and 3-vessel coronary artery disease (91%, 88%, and 86% for group A and 81%, 82%, and 82% for group B, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In the interpretation of myocardial Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT images, good interinstitutional observer agreement was found, mainly when the uniform display method was adopted.
BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the degree of interhospital agreement in the interpretation of exercise myocardial technetium-99m tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Five experienced hospital laboratories were asked to submit 2 sets of myocardial Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT images obtained in 150 patients undergoing coronary angiography: group A used a uniform color scale for all hospitals, and group B used the individual color scale in place at each hospital (uniform color scale, nonuniform color scale, and black-and-white scale). Thus a total of 300 images were interpreted by each center without knowledge of any other patient data. Angiographically significant coronary artery disease (< or =50% diameter stenosis) was present in 90 patients (60%). By a majority decision (3 or more centers), the sensitivity was found to be similar for groups A and B (82% and 84%, respectively), but the specificity was significantly higher for group A (87% vs 73%; P =.021). Four or all 5 of the centers agreed on abnormal or normal results of SPECT images in 87% of patients in group A (kappa 0.626) and in 78% of patients in group B (kappa 0.528). The kappa value of 0.617 was obtained for the uniform color scale, 0.467 for the uniform black-and-white scale, and 0.444 for the nonuniform color scale. Agreement on the left anterior descending artery territory (81% for group A and 78% for group B) was similar to that of the right coronary artery territory (79% for A and 75% for B) and to that of the left circumflex artery territory (91% for A and 85% for B). Agreement was similar in patients with 1-, 2-, and 3-vessel coronary artery disease (91%, 88%, and 86% for group A and 81%, 82%, and 82% for group B, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In the interpretation of myocardial Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT images, good interinstitutional observer agreement was found, mainly when the uniform display method was adopted.
Authors: B L Zaret; A Battler; H J Berger; M M Bodenheimer; J S Borer; M Brochier; P G Hugenholtz; H N Neufeld; M E Pfisterer Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 1984-10 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: R J Golub; A W Ahlberg; J R McClellan; S D Herman; M I Travin; J F Mather; P W Aitken; J I Baron; G V Heller Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 1999 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: J Maddahi; H Kiat; K F Van Train; F Prigent; J Friedman; E V Garcia; N Alazraki; E G DePuey; K Nichols; D S Berman Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1990-10-16 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: P R McLaughlin; R P Martin; P Doherty; S Daspit; M Goris; W Haskell; S Lewis; J P Kriss; D C Harrison Journal: Circulation Date: 1977-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: N P Alazraki; E G Krawczynska; E G DePuey; J A Ziffer; J P Vansant; R I Pettigrew; A Taylor; S B King; E V Garcia Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1994-08 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: D S Berman; X Kang; K F Van Train; H C Lewin; I Cohen; J Areeda; J D Friedman; G Germano; L J Shaw; R Hachamovitch Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: R C Hendel; M S Verani; D D Miller; F J Wackers; M McMahon; M D Cerqueira; E H Botvinick; L Kvols; M C Gerson Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 1996 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: C Anagnostopoulos; M Harbinson; A Kelion; K Kundley; C Y Loong; A Notghi; E Reyes; W Tindale; S R Underwood Journal: Heart Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Levent A Guner; Nese Ilgin Karabacak; Tansel Cakir; Ozgur U Akdemir; Sinan A Kocaman; Atiye Cengel; Mustafa Unlu Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: B Hesse; K Tägil; A Cuocolo; C Anagnostopoulos; M Bardiés; J Bax; F Bengel; E Busemann Sokole; G Davies; M Dondi; L Edenbrandt; P Franken; A Kjaer; J Knuuti; M Lassmann; M Ljungberg; C Marcassa; P Y Marie; F McKiddie; M O'Connor; E Prvulovich; R Underwood; B van Eck-Smit Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Jonathan W Weinsaft; Christopher L Gade; Franklin J Wong; Han W Kim; James K Min; Shant J Manoushagian; Peter M Okin; Massimiliano Szulc Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2007 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.952