Literature DB >> 9874043

Direct stent implantation without predilatation using the MultiLink stent.

D Pentousis1, Y Guérin, F Funck, H Zheng, M Toussaint, T Corcos, X Favereau.   

Abstract

The standard coronary stent implantation technique requires routine predilatation of the target lesion with a balloon catheter. In this study, we prospectively studied the feasibility and efficiency of elective coronary stent implantation without predilatation. In 94 patients who presented with various ischemic syndromes, direct implantation of 100 balloon expandable ACS MultiLink stents (7 over-the-wire, 93 rapid exchange) was attempted in 100 coronary lesions selected to have favorable characteristics. The stent crossed the lesion without predilatation in 97 cases (97%) and was successfully deployed in 93 (95.8%). In 4 patients, adjunctive high-pressure postdilatation was necessary to achieve optimal stent expansion. Reference vessel diameter was 3.12+/-0.77 mm and lesion length 8.8+/-2.7 mm. Minimal luminal diameter increased from 0.95+/-0.38 mm to 2.98+/-0.28 mm and diameter stenosis decreased from 71+/-11% to 8+/-11% after stenting. One occlusive dissection was treated by a second stent. There were no major in-hospital complications. At 1 month follow-up, 1 subacute thrombotic occlusion occurred. These results indicate that in a carefully selected coronary lesion subset, elective stent implantation without predilatation can be safely and effectively performed. The long-term results of this approach and possible advantages over the conventional implantation techniques remain unclear and need to be evaluated in further clinical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9874043     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00683-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

1.  Mechanism of lumen enlargement with direct stenting versus predilatation stenting: influence of remodelling and plaque characteristics assessed by volumetric intracoronary ultrasound.

Authors:  G Finet; N J Weissman; G S Mintz; L F Satler; K M Kent; J R Laird; G A Adelmann; A E Ajani; M T Castagna; G Rioufol; A D Pichard
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Managing a complication after direct stenting: removal of a maldeployed stent with rotational atherectomy.

Authors:  M Herzum; R Cosmeleata; B Maisch
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Clinical and angiographic outcome after conventional angioplasty with optional stent implantation compared with direct stenting without predilatation.

Authors:  S Miketic; J Carlsson; U Tebbe
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Randomised comparison of coronary stenting with and without balloon predilatation in selected patients.

Authors:  H Le Breton; J Boschat; P Commeau; P Brunel; M Gilard; C Breut; O Bar; P Geslin; A Tirouvanziam; L Maillard; B Moquet; P Barragan; P Dupouy; G Grollier; J Berland; P Druelles; R Rihani; B Huret; C Leclercq; M Bedossa
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Safety, efficacy and costs associated with direct coronary stenting compared with stenting after predilatation: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A IJsselmuiden; P W Serruys; G J Tangelder; T Slagboom; R van der Wieken; F Kiemeneij; G J Laarman
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Is coronary stent deployment and remodeling affected by predilatation? An intravascular ultrasound randomized study Stenting with or without predilation: an IVUS study.

Authors:  Jacques Boschat; Hervé Le Breton; P Commeau; Bernard Huret; Marc Bedossa; Martine Gilard
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.357

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.