Literature DB >> 9873982

Does pregnancy affect medical ethical decision making?

C Hammerman1, O Lavie, E Kornbluth, J Rabinson, M S Schimmel, A I Eidelman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We studied and compared the attitudes of pregnant women v new mothers in an attempt to confirm changing patterns of maternal response towards medical ethical decision making in critically ill or malformed neonates.
DESIGN: Data were obtained by questionnaires divided into three sections: 1. sociodemographic; 2. Theoretical principles which might be utilised in the decision-making process; 3. Hypothetical case scenarios, each followed by possible treatment options.
RESULTS: Pregnant women (n = 545) consistently requested less aggressive medical intervention for the hypothetical cases than did new mothers (n = 250) [Trisomy 18: 57% v 42%; p = 0.0004; Asphyxia: 75% v 63%; p = 0.0017; Down's syndrome 81% v 62%; p = 0.0001; LBW 85% v 75%; p = 0.004]. Significant differences were also observed in the responses to the theoretical principles, with pregnant women attributing less importance to preserving life at all cost, while being more concerned with physical and emotional pain and suffering, with financial cost, and with the infant's potential for future productivity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9873982      PMCID: PMC479142          DOI: 10.1136/jme.24.6.409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  12 in total

Review 1.  Ethical dilemmas of neonatal--perinatal surgery.

Authors:  A L Rostain; V K Bhutani
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.430

Review 2.  Meningomyelocele in the neonate: medical and ethical considerations.

Authors:  A Steinberg
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 3.  Ethical issues presented by children with congenital anomalies.

Authors:  S Segal
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.300

4.  Common stressors reported by a group of childbearing American women.

Authors:  D D Affonso; L J Mayberry
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  1990

Review 5.  From how small is too small to how much is too much. Ethical issues at the limits of neonatal viability.

Authors:  J L Peabody; G I Martin
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.430

6.  Life-saving therapy for newborns: a questionnaire survey in the state of Massachusetts.

Authors:  I D Todres; J Guillemin; M A Grodin; D Batten
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Ethical decision-making and neonatal resuscitation.

Authors:  P J Byrne; J M Tyebkhan; L M Laing
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.300

8.  A comparison of mothers' concerns regarding the care-taking tasks of newborns with congenital heart disease before and after assuming their care.

Authors:  J M Pinelli
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 9.  Predictors of depression symptoms in pregnant adolescents.

Authors:  D Koniak-Griffin; D S Walker; J de Traversay
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  At risk for depression: a study of young mothers.

Authors:  N D Colletta
Journal:  J Genet Psychol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 1.509

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.