Literature DB >> 9872850

A simple automated method for measuring pressure-volume curves during mechanical ventilation.

Q Lu1, S R Vieira, J Richecoeur, L Puybasset, P Kalfon, P Coriat, J J Rouby.   

Abstract

Measurement of respiratory compliance is advocated for assessing the severity of acute respiratory failure (ARF). Recently, the administration of an automated constant flow of 15 L/min was proposed as a method easier to implement at the bedside than supersyringe or inspiratory occlusions methods. However, pressure-volume (P-V) curves were shifted to the right because of the resistive properties of the respiratory system. The aim of this study was to compare the P-V curves obtained using two constant flows-3 and 9 L/min-during volume-controlled mechanical ventilation with those obtained with the supersyringe and the inspiratory occlusions methods. Fourteen paralyzed patients with ARF were studied. The supersyringe and the inspiratory occlusions methods were performed according to usual recommendations. The new automated method was performed during volume-controlled mechanical ventilation by setting the inspiratory:expiratory ratio at 80%, the respiratory frequency at 5 breaths/min, and the tidal volume at 500 or 1,500 ml. These peculiar ventilatory settings were equivalent to administering a constant flow of 3 or 9 L/min during a 9.6-s inspiration. Esophageal and airway pressures were recorded. P-V curves obtained by the 3-L/min constant-flow method were identical to those obtained by the reference methods, whereas the P-V curve obtained by the 9-L/min constant flow was slightly shifted to the right. The slopes of the P-V curves and the lower inflection points were not different between all methods, indicating that the resistive component induced by administering a constant flow equal to or less than 9 L/min is not of clinical relevance. Because the 3-L/min constant-flow method is not artifacted by the resistive properties of the respiratory system and does not require any other equipment than a ventilator, it is an easy-to-implement, inexpensive, safe, and reliable method for measuring the thoracopulmonary P-V curve at the bedside.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9872850     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.159.1.9802082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  22 in total

1.  Early patterns of static pressure-volume loops in ARDS and their relations with PEEP-induced recruitment.

Authors:  Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Sebastien Prin; Karim Chergui; Bernard Page; Alain Beauchet; François Jardin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-08-16       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Pressure-volume curve patterns in ARDS patients.

Authors:  David Pestaña
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-02       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Repeated generation of the pulmonary pressure-volume curve may lead to derecruitment in experimental lung injury.

Authors:  Dietrich Henzler; Andreas Mahnken; Rolf Dembinski; Britta Waskowiak; Rolf Rossaint; Ralf Kuhlen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  ICASP: an intensive-care acquisition and signal processing integrated framework.

Authors:  Eleftheria J Siachalou; Ilias K Kitsas; Konstantinos J Panoulas; Emmanouil Th Zadelis; Christos D Saragiotis; Yannis A Tolias; Leontios J Hadjileontiadis; Stavros M Panas
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Alveolar recruitment assessed by positron emission tomography during experimental acute lung injury.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Richard; Didier Le Bars; Nicolas Costes; Fabienne Bregeon; Christian Tourvieille; Franck Lavenne; Marc Janier; Gérard Gimenez; Claude Guerin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  What's new in respiratory physiology? The expanding chest wall revisited!

Authors:  Ola Stenqvist; Luciano Gattinoni; Göran Hedenstierna
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Positive end-expiratory pressure lung recruitment: comparison between lower inflection point and ultrasound assessment.

Authors:  Bojan Rode; Marinko Vučić; Mladen Siranović; Ana Horvat; Helena Krolo; Mijo Kelečić; Aleksandar Gopčević
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  PEEP-induced changes in lung volume in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Two methods to estimate alveolar recruitment.

Authors:  J Dellamonica; N Lerolle; C Sargentini; G Beduneau; F Di Marco; A Mercat; J C M Richard; J L Diehl; J Mancebo; J J Rouby; Q Lu; G Bernardin; L Brochard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  A new automated method versus continuous positive airway pressure method for measuring pressure-volume curves in patients with acute lung injury.

Authors:  Enrique Piacentini; Marc Wysocki; Lluis Blanch
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Recruitability of the lung estimated by the pressure volume curve hysteresis in ARDS patients.

Authors:  Didier Demory; Jean-Michel Arnal; Marc Wysocki; Stéphane Donati; Isabelle Granier; Gaëlle Corno; Jacques Durand-Gasselin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.