Literature DB >> 9872819

Reconciling in vitro and in vivo measurements of aerosol delivery from a metered-dose inhaler during mechanical ventilation and defining efficiency-enhancing factors.

J B Fink1, R Dhand, J Grychowski, P J Fahey, M J Tobin.   

Abstract

We attempted to resolve the discrepancies in reported data on aerosol deposition from a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-propelled metered-dose inhaler (MDI) during mechanical ventilation, obtained by in vivo and in vitro methodologies. Albuterol delivery to the lower respiratory tract was decreased in a humidified versus a dry circuit (16.2 versus 30.4%, respectively; p < 0.01). In 10 mechanically ventilated patients, 4.8% of the nominal dose was exhaled. When the exhaled aerosol was subtracted from the in vitro delivery of 16.2% achieved in a humidified ventilator circuit, the resulting value (16.2 - 4.8 = 11.4%) was similar to in vivo estimates of aerosol deposition. Having reconciled in vitro with in vivo findings, we then evaluated factors influencing aerosol delivery. A lower inspiratory flow rate (40 versus 80 L/min; p < 0.001), a longer duty cycle (0.50 versus 0.25; p < 0.04), and a shorter interval between successive MDI actuations (15 versus 60 s; p < 0.02) increased aerosol delivery, whereas use of a hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)-propelled MDI decreased aerosol delivery compared with the CFC-propelled MDI. A MDI and actuator combination other than that designed by the manufacturer altered aerosol particle size and decreased drug delivery. In conclusion, aerosol delivery in an in vitro model accurately reflects in vivo delivery, providing a means for investigating methods to improve the efficiency of aerosol therapy during mechanical ventilation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9872819     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.159.1.9803119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  17 in total

1.  Maximizing aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation: go with the flow and go slow.

Authors:  Rajiv Dhand
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Aerosolization of perfluorocarbons during mechanical ventilation: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Tobias Gregor; Gerd Schmalisch; Wolfram Burkhardt; Hans Proquitté; Roland R Wauer; Mario Rüdiger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Challenges Associated with Route of Administration in Neonatal Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Matthew W Linakis; Jessica K Roberts; Anita C Lala; Michael G Spigarelli; Natalie J Medlicott; David M Reith; Robert M Ward; Catherine M T Sherwin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Comparison of lung tissue concentrations of nebulized ceftazidime in ventilated piglets: ultrasonic versus vibrating plate nebulizers.

Authors:  Fabio Ferrari; Zhi-Hai Liu; Qin Lu; Marie-Helene Becquemin; Kamel Louchahi; Guy Aymard; Charles-Hugo Marquette; Jean-Jacques Rouby
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Aerosol delivery via invasive ventilation: a narrative review.

Authors:  Hui-Ling Lin; James B Fink; Huiqing Ge
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

6.  In vitro study and semiempirical model for aerosol delivery control during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Laurent Vecellio; Claude Guérin; Daniel Grimbert; Michele De Monte; Patrice Diot
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  RNAi therapeutic strategies for acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Melissa L Jagrosse; David A Dean; Arshad Rahman; Bradley L Nilsson
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 7.012

8.  Jet nebulization of prostaglandin E1 during neonatal mechanical ventilation: stability, emitted dose and aerosol particle size.

Authors:  Beena G Sood; Jennifer Peterson; Monica Malian; Robert Galli; Maria Geisor-Walter; Jon McKinnon; Jody Sharp; Krishna Rao Maddipati
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 7.658

9.  Aerosol therapy during mechanical ventilation: an international survey.

Authors:  Stephan Ehrmann; Ferran Roche-Campo; Giuseppe Francesco Sferrazza Papa; Daniel Isabey; Laurent Brochard; Gabriela Apiou-Sbirlea
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  In vitro evaluation of aerosol bronchodilator delivery during mechanical ventilation: pressure-control vs. volume control ventilation.

Authors:  Dean R Hess; Christine Dillman; Robert M Kacmarek
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.