Literature DB >> 9872618

A prospective study of the management of the young Helicobacter pylori negative dyspeptic patient--can gastroscopies be saved in clinical practice?

A Heaney1, J S Collins, T C Tham, P R Watson, J R McFarland, K B Bamford.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori status has been suggested as a means of selecting young dyspeptic patients for gastroscopy as patients who are H. pylori negative and do not exhibit alarm symptoms or ingest non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication have a low risk of serious organic disease. AIM: To determine if young patients with ulcer-like dyspepsia and found to be H. pylori negative on non-invasive testing could be reassured by this knowledge and not proceed to gastroscopy. PATIENTS: One hundred and sixty-one consecutive attendees aged 45 years or less with a presenting complaint of epigastric pain or discomfort were prospectively recruited from open access gastroscopy referrals and gastroenterology clinics.
METHODS: Patients who were H. pylori negative on 13-carbon urea breath test were reassured of the likelihood of a normal gastroscopy, given lifestyle advice and also advised to take symptomatic therapy as required. Patients were reviewed at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months when symptoms and quality of life were reassessed. Patients proceeded to gastroscopy if at any review their dyspepsia score stayed the same or worsened.
RESULTS: Fifty-five H. pylori negative patients were recruited (30 male, mean age 31 years), two patients did not attend subsequent review. Thirty-two (58%) came to gastroscopy. Endoscopic diagnoses included 25 which were normal, three with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, three with peptic ulcer disease and one with gastric erosions. Dyspepsia and quality of life scores showed significant improvement over 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: This management strategy resulted in a 42% reduction in gastroscopies in H. pylori negative patients. Whilst the majority of patients endoscoped had normal findings, seven patients (22%) had pathology. Overall there were significant improvements in dyspepsia and quality of life at 6 month follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9872618     DOI: 10.1097/00042737-199811000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  7 in total

1.  Limited impact on endoscopy demand from a primary care based 'test and treat' dyspepsia management strategy: the results of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ian S Shaw; Roland M Valori; André Charlett; Cliodna A M McNulty
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Age and alarm symptoms do not predict endoscopic findings among patients with dyspepsia: a multicentre database study.

Authors:  M B Wallace; V L Durkalski; J Vaughan; Y Y Palesch; E D Libby; P S Jowell; N J Nickl; S M Schutz; J W Leung; P B Cotton
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  A prospective randomised trial of a "test and treat" policy versus endoscopy based management in young Helicobacter pylori positive patients with ulcer-like dyspepsia, referred to a hospital clinic.

Authors:  A Heaney; J S Collins; R G Watson; R J McFarland; K B Bamford; T C Tham
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  What have we learned from recent dyspepsia trials?

Authors:  J J Ofman
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2000-12

5.  [Clinical practice guideline on the management of patients with dyspepsia. Update 2012].

Authors:  Javier P Gisbert; Xavier Calvet; Juan Ferrándiz; Juan Mascort; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Mercè Marzo
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 1.137

6.  Sensitivity of ultrasonography for gastric cancer diagnosis in symptomatic patients.

Authors:  David Martinez-Ares; Pedro A Alonso Aguirre; Jesús Yáñez López; Ignacio Martín-Granizo Barrenechea; Jesús Martinez Cadilla; Dolores Rodriguez Martinez; Abel Pallarés Peral
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  A comparison of open access endoscopy and hospital-referred endoscopy in a district general hospital.

Authors:  S D Johnston; J Kirby; E Mackle; T J Robinson
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1999-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.