Literature DB >> 9870165

Delorme's operation and sphincteroplasty for rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence.

M Pescatori1, A Interisano, V M Stolfi, M Zoffoli.   

Abstract

Clinical and manometric results of Delorme's operation and sphincteroplasty were assessed retrospectively in patients undergoing this procedure for fecal incontinence and rectal prolapse. A series of 33 patients (11 males, 22 females; aged 18-83 years, mean 59) with external rectal prolapse were treated by Delorme's operation between 1989 and 1996. Mean follow-up was 39 months (range 7-84). Sphincteroplasty was associated in 12 cases with severe fecal incontinence due to striated muscle defects. Good results were achieved in 27 patients (79%); prolapse recurrence was observed in 6 (21%), the mean recurrence time being 9 months (range 1-24 months). There were no postoperative deaths. Minor complications occurred in 15 patients. Changes in preoperative and postoperative manometric patterns were as follows (mean +/- SEM): voluntary contraction from 59 +/- 6.9 to 66 +/- 7.1 mmHg (P = 0.05), resting tone from 33 +/- 5 to 32 +/- 4.3 mmHg, rectal sensation from 59 +/- 5 to 61 +/- 5.2 ml of air (n.s.). A solitary rectal ulcer syndrome was detected in five patients. The histological pattern demonstrated pathological changes in 40% of cases. Fecal incontinence was resolved in 6 of 20 cases (30%) and chronic constipation in 4 of 9 (44%). Failure (n = 3) was related primarily to postoperative sepsis. The incontinence score showed a mean improvement of 35% decreasing, from 4.5 +/- 0.39 to 2.9 +/- 0.44 after surgery (P < 0.01). In conclusion, Delorme's procedure did not lead to constipation and improved anal continence when associated with sphincteroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9870165     DOI: 10.1007/s003840050165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  19 in total

1.  [Rectal prolapse in adults].

Authors:  W Heitland
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Rectal prolapse: which surgical option is appropriate?

Authors:  T H K Schiedeck; O Schwandner; J Scheele; S Farke; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Scott D Goldstein; Pinckney J Maxwell
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2011-03

4.  Mesh invasion of the rectum: an unusual late complication of rectal prolapse repair.

Authors:  Erdal Karagulle; Erkan Yildirim; Emin Turk; Didem Akkaya; Gokhan Moray
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Complications and reinterventions after surgery for obstructed defecation.

Authors:  Mario Pescatori; Giovanni Milito; Marina Fiorino; Federica Cadeddu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Delorme's Procedure for Full-Thickness Rectal Prolapse; Does it Alter Anorectal Function.

Authors:  Sabry A Mahmoud; Waleed Omar; Kamal Abdel-Elah; Mohamed Farid
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 0.656

7.  Perineal approaches to rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Mari A Madsen
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-05

8.  Rectal prolapse.

Authors:  David P O'Brien
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-05

9.  Functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  T T Zittel; K Manncke; S Haug; J F Schäfer; M E Kreis; H D Becker; E C Jehle
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  A novel approach for perirectal tumours: the perianal intersphincteric excision.

Authors:  M Pescatori; L Brusciano; G A Binda; A Serventi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.