Literature DB >> 9870055

The Camino intracranial pressure device in clinical practice: reliability, handling characteristics and complications.

E Münch1, R Weigel, P Schmiedek, L Schürer.   

Abstract

Intracranial pressure monitoring has a key role in the management of patients developing increased intracranial pressure (ICP). We adopted the Camino fiberoptic system for intracranial pressure measurement in 1993 in our neurosurgical department. The aim of this study was to investigate reliability, handling characteristics and complication rate of the Camino intracranial pressure device. In an eighteen month period, we prospectively investigated 118 patients with intracranial pathology undergoing Camino fiberoptic intraparenchymal or intraventricular ICP monitoring. The assessment of reliability of ICP monitoring according to patients clinical condition, to cranial computed tomography (CCT) findings and ICP waveform was carried out. Position of the probe and intracranial bleeding complications related to probe insertion were confirmed by CCT. Technical complications, as well as infections due to the device, were documented. In vivo recalibration was performed in 22 patients. At the end of the measuring period the drift of the probe was evaluated and the accuracy of the fiberoptic device was measured by performing a two point calibration. Recordings of intracranial pressure were carried out with 136 Camino devices (104 parenchymal, 32 ventricular) in 118 patients with an average measuring time of 94.1 +/- 79.1 hrs. One hundred and fifteen Camino intracranial pressure devices (85.2%) demonstrated reliability according to the predetermined clinical parameters. The actual mean drift after removal of the devices was 3.4 mmHg +/- 3.2 with an actual daily drift of 3.2 +/- 17.2 mmHg. Recorded complications included infection (0.7%), intraparenchymal haematoma (5.1%), and a high complication rate (23.5%) with regard to technical aspects. The Camino intracranial pressure system offers reliable ICP measurements in an acceptable percentage of devices, and the advantage of in vivo recalibration. The high incidence of technical complications identifies a need for improvement in the fiberoptic cable and the fixation system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9870055     DOI: 10.1007/s007010050224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  9 in total

Review 1.  Multimodal monitoring and neurocritical care bioinformatics.

Authors:  J Claude Hemphill; Peter Andrews; Michael De Georgia
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 2.  Intracranial pressure monitoring in children with single suture and complex craniosynostosis: a review.

Authors:  G Tamburrini; M Caldarelli; L Massimi; P Santini; C Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Performance characteristics of a new generation pressure microsensor for physiologic applications.

Authors:  Patrick S Cottler; Whitney R Karpen; Duane A Morrow; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 4.  Optical Fibre Pressure Sensors in Medical Applications.

Authors:  Sven Poeggel; Daniele Tosi; DineshBabu Duraibabu; Gabriel Leen; Deirdre McGrath; Elfed Lewis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  Advances in Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Its Significance in Managing Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Usmah Kawoos; Richard M McCarron; Charles R Auker; Mikulas Chavko
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Intracranial pressure monitoring during adult spinal deformity correction in a patient with critical venous occlusive disease and superior vena cava syndrome: A technical note.

Authors:  Alp Ozpinar; Jesse J Liu; Zachary J Tempel; Phillip A Choi; Robert A Hart; D Kojo Hamilton
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-04-20

Review 7.  Accuracy of intracranial pressure monitoring: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lucia Zacchetti; Sandra Magnoni; Federica Di Corte; Elisa R Zanier; Nino Stocchetti
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Early Experience of Automated Intraventricular Type Intracranial Pressure Monitoring (LiquoGuard®) for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.

Authors:  Young Sub Kwon; Yun Ho Lee; Jin Mo Cho
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-04-30

9.  Keep an Eye on the Intracranial Pressure, Thanks to the Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter.

Authors:  Alexandre Vagh Weinmann; Charlotte Beaucreux; Kevin Kearns; Clément Dubost
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.