Literature DB >> 9870010

Complications of dual chamber pacemaker implantation in the elderly. Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly (PASE) Investigators.

M S Link1, N A Estes, J J Griffin, P J Wang, J D Maloney, J B Kirchhoffer, G F Mitchell, J Orav, L Goldman, G A Lamas.   

Abstract

Pacemakers are frequently implanted, yet accurate prospective data on implant complications are limited. Elderly patients may be at increased risk of implant complications and are increasingly being referred for pacemaker implantation. The purpose of the present analysis was to define the incidence and possible predictors of serious complications of dual chamber permanent pacemaker implantation in the elderly. Therefore, we sought to prospectively identify the incidence and predictors of pacemaker implant complications in a large multicenter trial involving patients receiving a dual chamber pacemaker. The Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly (PASE) study was a prospective trial designed to evaluate quality of life in dual chamber pacemaker recipients age 65 years or older randomized to DDDR versus VVIR programming. In addition to being age 65 years or older, patients enrolled in this study were in normal sinus rhythm, and had standard indications for permanent pacemaker implantation. All patients received dual chamber pacemakers and were randomized to DDDR versus VVIR pacing. Pacemaker implant complications were collected on standardized forms which were completed at pacemaker implantation and during follow-up appointments. In this study of 407 patients, there were 26 complications occurring in 25 patients (6.1%). The most frequent complication was lead dislodgment which occurred in 9 patients. This was followed by pneumothorax (8 patients) and cardiac perforations (4 patients). In 18 patients (4.4%) repeat surgical procedures (including chest tubes) were required. Complications were noted prior to discharge in only 18 patients. There were no significant predictors of overall complications. Pneumothorax was more frequent in patients > or = 75 years old, and was observed only in patients with subclavian venous access. In conclusion, complications from pacemaker implantation in the elderly are seen in 6.1% of patients and 4.4% of patients require a repeat surgical procedure. Other than advanced age and lower weight predicting for pneumothorax, there are no significant clinical predictors of complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9870010     DOI: 10.1023/a:1009707700412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  12 in total

1.  Complications after single versus dual chamber pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  X Mueller; H Sadeghi; L Kappenberger
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 2.  Pacemaker mode selection and survival: a plea to apply the principles of evidence based medicine to cardiac pacing practice.

Authors:  G A Lamas
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Survey of cardiac pacing and defibrillation in the United States in 1993.

Authors:  A D Bernstein; V Parsonnet
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Complications of permanent transvenous cardiac pacing: a 14-year review of all transvenous pacemakers inserted at one community hospital.

Authors:  P E Hill
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 1.976

5.  Pacemaker-implantation complication rates: an analysis of some contributing factors.

Authors:  V Parsonnet; A D Bernstein; B Lindsay
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1989-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  [Complications after pacemaker-implantation and their treatment (author's transl)].

Authors:  W P Klövekorn; E Struck; T Sasa
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 1.443

7.  Comparative reproducibility and validity of systems for assessing cardiovascular functional class: advantages of a new specific activity scale.

Authors:  L Goldman; B Hashimoto; E F Cook; A Loscalzo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  [Early and late complications of endocardial pacemaker wires (author's transl)].

Authors:  J Bücking; H Voss; J Stein; U Hahner
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  1980-06

9.  The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale. An examination of its reliability and validity in a research setting.

Authors:  V Mor; L Laliberte; J N Morris; M Wiemann
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in permanent pacemaker implantation: a prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  J P Mounsey; M J Griffith; M Tynan; F K Gould; A F MacDermott; R G Gold; R S Bexton
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-10
View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Determinants of intracellular pH in the erythrocyte.

Authors:  J Warth; J F Desforges
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 2.  [Strategies for the avoidance and treatment of complications during pacemaker implantation].

Authors:  C Kolb
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2007-12

3.  [Single- and dual-chamber ICDs: Are there still significant differences compared to pacemakers with regard to implantation and follow-up?].

Authors:  M Stockburger
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-12

Review 4.  Radiology of cardiac devices and their complications.

Authors:  J Dipoce; A Bernheim; H Spindola-Franco
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Pacemaker insertion.

Authors:  Maria Kotsakou; Ioannis Kioumis; George Lazaridis; Georgia Pitsiou; Sofia Lampaki; Antonis Papaiwannou; Anastasia Karavergou; Kosmas Tsakiridis; Nikolaos Katsikogiannis; Ilias Karapantzos; Chrysanthi Karapantzou; Sofia Baka; Ioannis Mpoukovinas; Vasilis Karavasilis; Aggeliki Rapti; Georgia Trakada; Athanasios Zissimopoulos; Konstantinos Zarogoulidis; Paul Zarogoulidis
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-03

6.  Pacemaker implantation in the extreme elderly.

Authors:  Robert T Stevenson; David Lugg; Robert Gray; Douglas Hollis; Michelle Stoner; Jeffrey L Williams
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Long term complications in single and dual chamber pacing are influenced by surgical experience and patient morbidity.

Authors:  F Eberhardt; F Bode; H Bonnemeier; F Boguschewski; M Schlei; W Peters; U K H Wiegand
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  The frequency and incremental cost of major complications among medicare beneficiaries receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  Matthew R Reynolds; David J Cohen; Aaron D Kugelmass; Phillip P Brown; Edmund R Becker; Steven D Culler; April W Simon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Pacemaker Implantation in Elderly Patients: Safety of Various Regimens of Anticoagulant Therapy.

Authors:  Denis Terekhov; Valeriy Agapov; Kirill Kulikov; Svetlana Zadorozhnaya; Vasiliy Samitin; Vladimir Maslyakov
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2017-02-28

Review 10.  Pacemaker implantation in small hospitals: complication rates comparable to larger centres.

Authors:  Bjørn Haug; Kjærsti Kjelsberg; Knut Tore Lappegård
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 5.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.